Our normal waking consciousness, rational consciousness
as we call it, is but one special type of consciousness, whilst all
about it, parted from it by the filmiest of screens, there lie potential
forms of consciousness entirely different. …No account of the
universe in its totality can be final which leaves these other forms
of consciousness quite disregarded.
—
William James, The Varieties of Religious Experience (1)
If other more advanced forms of planetary life were observing
life on this planet and our calamitous effect on it, I wonder what they
would think of the various beliefs which influence our behaviour. How
might they communicate with us? Perhaps with the magnificent crop circles
that have appeared in our summer fields for many years now, suggesting
that there is more to be understood about our universe than we know.
If
it were to be accepted beyond a shadow of a doubt that these complex,
beautiful and mathematically coded patterns were made by an intelligence
other than our own, it might produce the biggest change in our thinking
since Copernicus’ discovery that the sun rather than the earth
was the centre of our solar system. Some might recoil in fear; others
might be excited and thrilled to know that there was something utterly
unexpected that could break the spell of our beliefs and shock us into
awareness of a different concept of reality.
There
is a moment in a book called A Journey in Ladakh by Andrew
Harvey, where he records the words of a Tibetan monk, Nawang Tsering.
Referring to this present time as Kali Yuga - the Age of Darkness and
Destruction - Nawang says that the great danger for the world now is
the loss of spiritual vision and that our task is to keep that vision
alive, to see that it lives through these dark times. He speaks of the
powers of love, healing and clarity that lie latent within us and asks
that we should strive to develop these, both for our own sakes and for
that of others and says that we will need to attune ourselves to the
deepest levels of spirit if we are to have a hope of surviving this
era. (2)
For millions of people in the West, Nawang’s message may not seem
to apply. But for those traumatized millions living in the Congo and
Zimbabwe, in Tibet, Afghanistan, Darfur and Chechnya, the Palestinian
Territories or any place where conflict, cruelty, persecution and destitution
prevail, it does. Looking at the state of the world and the helpless
suffering of so many, it seems obvious that our current moral and spiritual
immaturity threatens our very survival as a species. In the midst of
this present darkness, how can we invoke the powers of love, of healing,
of clear vision? How can we become aware of the origin of many of our
beliefs and assess their value to us?
Certain
deeply held ideas or belief systems grow into meta-narratives, worldviews
or paradigms of reality which can inspire, structure and influence a
culture for thousands of years. But they can also block our further
development by subtle methods of control that may not at first seem
obvious. There are religious meta-narratives such as the Christian,
Hindu, Buddhist or Islamic one, and secular ones, such as the belief
in material progress and scientific and technological advance. At present,
we seem to be influenced by two primary meta-narratives: the religious
belief in a remote creator God who is transcendent to us and life on
this planet and the secular one which believes that we live in an inanimate
universe which is without consciousness, purpose or meaning.
The Secular Worldview of Our Age
Early
in the 20th century the French artist Odilon Redon painted a picture
of the one-eyed giant, the Cyclops. Its single eye gazes down on the
flower-strewn expanse where a naked woman lies in a brilliantly luminous
landscape. To me, the image of the Cyclops reflects the constriction
as well as the inflation of the modern mind which, ignorant of the vast
dimensions of planetary and cosmic life on which it rests and out of
which it has evolved, believes itself to be in control of nature and
its own nature. It evokes the much-quoted words of Blake — “May
God us keep from the single vision and Newton’s sleep.”(3)
Yet
the painting also communicates a tremendous sadness, the sadness of
a one-eyed consciousness that is cut off from its ground, that has no
relationship with soul and with nature—personified in this painting
by the woman lying on the flower-strewn ground. The rational or literal
secular eye stands lonely and supreme, cut off from the landscape of
the soul.
Over
the last few centuries but more pervasively during the last fifty years,
a secular worldview or paradigm has slowly infiltrated every aspect
of the modern world, dominating the media, the arts, science and philosophy
as well as economic, political and educational agendas. It views life
through an increasingly utilitarian and materialistic mind-set, seeing
no goal for humanity beyond the improvement of material conditions through
the growth of each nation’s GDP and scientific, medical and technological
advance. By excluding, rejecting and deriding so much, particularly
in relation to the great spiritual and cultural achievements of the
past and the unanswered questions of the human condition, it drastically
limits our understanding of ourselves and our place in the cosmos. Above
all, it has turned its back on anything it designates as non-rational.
It
is true that science has opened up an immense and thrilling panorama:
geologists and biologists have pieced together the story of the earth’s
evolution; cosmologists have defined the incredible story of the birth,
expansion and extent of the visible universe, although this is continually
being revised in the light of new discoveries; particle physicists are
penetrating the mysteries of the sub-atomic world; geneticists are applying
the discoveries of the genetic code to healing the terrible diseases
which still afflict us. Neuro-scientists are making phenomenal discoveries
about the human brain. But there is as yet no unifying vision of our
purpose on this planet which could take us beyond the single vision
of Newton’s sleep. As Matthew Arnold put it in his poem Dover
Beach,
We are here as on a darkling plain,
Swept with confused alarms of struggle and flight,
Where ignorant armies clash by night.
Modern
secular culture has exalted man as the supreme agent of his own triumphant
scientific and technological progress but it has also reduced him to
the level of a biological mechanism, subject to the programming of his
genetic inheritance. It has created a society that believes in nothing
beyond its own technological prowess and the omnipotent power of the
human mind. It has done away with any ethical foundation for values.
It does not question the premises which direct its conclusions nor does
it look at the effects of its beliefs on people living in this culture.
In summary, we live in an unconscious civilization, as the Canadian
philosopher John Ralston Saul describes it in his book of that title.
(4)
The
dominant belief of secular culture is the Neo-Darwinian one that life
on this planet has evolved by natural selection and that we are simply
the product of our biological genes and our interaction with our environment.
Life has come into being by chance; its biological evolution is controlled
by chance. It has neither meaning nor purpose. Matter is primary and
gives rise to mind as a secondary phenomenon. Consciousness is therefore
a by-product of the brain. This belief system tells us that we are the
products of mindless forces operating on inanimate matter; atoms are
lifeless particles, floating in a dead universe. There is no such thing
as free will because we are nothing more than a vast assembly of nerve
cells, as Francis Crick, the discoverer of DNA, described us. The body
is a mechanism that can be manipulated and controlled by the mind. We
exist to improve the material conditions of our lives, to work, consume
and enjoy what we can accumulate in the way of wealth or material things.
When we die, that is the end of us. Is it surprising that governments
have come to define us as units of consumption rather than living, sensate
beings?
The
most vociferous promoter of this theory is the biologist Richard Dawkins,
whose “selfish gene” hypothesis suggests that the human
being is no more than a gene-replicating machine. This reductionist
hypothesis developing from a Newtonian/Cartesian/Darwinian foundation
and presented as “truth” empties the entire human endeavour
of transcendent meaning, purpose and significance. There is no vertical
axis, nothing that might connect us to a field of consciousness that
is beyond our immediate sensory experience, nothing that could provide
an ethical framework for our values and our behaviour. While I think
it is true to say that this secular ideology and the reductionist science
that has developed out of it has freed large sections of humanity from
the absolute control of religious institutions, it would also seem to
have replaced one rigid belief system by another. By a conviction of
omnipotent self-righteousness, it suppresses a mass of data that could
be of immense interest, relevance and value to our culture. One example
of this is the repeated attempts to disparage and invalidate alternative
approaches to healing, such as homeopathy or acupuncture, saying that
because their efficacy cannot be scientifically proven, they are worthless.
So
are we the random creation of a mechanical, mindless universe as Dawkins
and scientific materialism proclaim, or do we participate in the life
of a living universe that animates and orchestrates its evolution from
within its own cosmic and planetary processes? How can we answer this
question until we understand what consciousness is and the whole evolutionary
development of the kind of consciousness we now have? We can only truly
comprehend our history and ourselves through the lens of human consciousness.
This lens may not yet be capable of giving us the full picture, however
much empirical scientific knowledge we may have. It may be that our
vision is clouded by something comparable to a giant cataract or restricted
to single vision in the manner of Redon’s Cyclops. Neuroscientists
can map the brain and connect different functions with specific areas
of it, even the different areas which may give rise to what we call
wisdom. Surprisingly, they are finding that the more primitive “emotional”
parts of the brain play a role in developing the qualities of empathy,
compassion, insight and tolerance - all of which might be said to be
involved in developing wisdom. But they cannot tell us exactly how the
incredibly complex neurochemistry of the brain gives rise to our imagination,
our specific thoughts and feelings and the collaboration between them
which might bring the quality of wisdom into being. Scientists cannot
yet answer the question of how consciousness arises out of matter; how,
when and, above all, why apparently “dead” matter can give
rise to life and, ultimately, to consciousness. And they cannot yet
answer the question: What exactly is life or, for that matter, what
is consciousness?
The Great Adventure of Our Time
Nevertheless,
for a cosmologist, as for the neuroscientist, this is an intoxicating
time to be alive, participating in the immense adventure of exploring
the mystery of the universe as well as the mystery of ourselves. The
night sky has become numinous, as enthralling as it was to the ancient
Sumerians and Egyptians, watching and noting the movement of the planets
and constellations from the rooftops of their houses. One of the things
that is changing our view of reality is the discovery of the immensity
and age of the universe as well as the incredible beauty of the galaxies
recorded by the Hubble telescope which is able to look back eleven billion
years—two billion after the initial explosion of the universe
and is finding layer upon layer of galaxies as far as its eye can see.
Now the new Herschel telescope (launched in May 2009) is going even
beyond the limits reached by Hubble. All this is a marvel and it has
been brought to us by science. Who in this vast universe might be looking
at us as we gaze into where we have come from in that dazzlingly distant
past?
According
to the prevailing theory of the Big Bang, thirteen to fourteen billion
years ago as we understand time in our three-dimensional world, a stupendous
explosion of cosmic energy took place, expanding instantaneously from
a fireball smaller than an atom. The first second held the inconceivable
energy that fuelled not only the creation of a hundred billion galaxies
through billion-year paths of expansion, but also the evolution of life
on this planet. Aeons later, out of this planetary life, the human species
evolved and, ultimately, human consciousness—our consciousness.
The
story of the evolution of our own species streams like the tail of a
comet through the darkness of ages now inaccessible to us. The life
of our species is embedded in the unimaginably old life of the universe
but, closer to us, in the four billion-year-old life of this planet.
Complex life has evolved here through a truly extraordinary series of
fortuitous developments which are only now revealing themselves to scientists.
The Milky Way galaxy that we belong to with its hundreds of billions
of stars is part of an immense cluster of galaxies—the Virgo supercluster—that
is fifty-three million light years away from us.
One
of the questions that most fascinates cosmologists is whether there
could be life on other planets. Are there people like us “out
there” with whom we could communicate? Would they have developed
a more advanced intelligence than our own? Are there planets with life
on them that have developed a more complex kind of intelligence, a more
advanced technology? Scientists think there could be up to 40,000 planets
in our galaxy alone that could support life and out of these a minimum
of some 350 could have the cosmic and planetary conditions which could
allow complex life to emerge. Nasa has just launched a new telescope
called Kepler, sent off into space in order to find planets in the Milky
Way that might be capable of sustaining life (March 2009). The search
will be concentrated in the area of the constellations of Cygnus and
Lyra which are between 600 and 3,000 light years away. Yet the life
of our planet is so extraordinary that it is thought unlikely that there
could be other planets whose formation is exactly like ours. Where the
conditions exist for some kind of life there could be entities like
ourselves with abilities and thoughts like ours or with a consciousness
so different from ours that we cannot even conceive of what it might
be like. Incredibly, Kepler's lenses are so powerful that from space
they are able to detect one of us turning on an outside light at night.
Vast
and still relatively unmapped as it is, our visible universe is thought
to be ninety-three billion light years across, but as yet there is no
way of ascertaining how far it may extend beyond the reach of the vision
of our instruments. It may be only an island in something resembling
a cosmic archipelago of universes. (5) Inside
every collapsing black hole may lie another expanding universe that
we know nothing about. String theorists hypothesize that there may be
other universes parallel to our own as well as other hidden dimensions
to this universe. Of the portion of the universe we actually can observe,
approximately four percent is visible to the eye. So what and where
is the other ninety-six percent?
Cosmologists
thought that the universe would be slowing down after its billions of
years of expansion. From supernova explosions that took place ten billion
years ago they have been able to calculate how fast the universe has
been expanding since that time. But they found that, far from slowing
down, the universe was expanding. So they wondered whether there was
a force that could oppose and counter-act gravity? They discovered something
which they named “dark energy”—a force that was strong
enough to counteract and overcome all the gravity in the entire cosmos
and impel it to expand faster and faster. They don’t yet know
what it is or how it works but they do know that it is active on an
inter-galactic scale and does not apparently affect our earth or solar
system. Yet, with the equally mysterious “dark matter,”
it has played an central role in how we came to exist. Dark matter seems
to hold things together; dark energy pushes them apart. It seems that
as long as these forces are held in balance, the universe survives.
All this is far beyond the reach of my understanding and I am immensely
grateful to the television programmes presided over by the Astronomer-Royal,
Sir Martin Rees and others which have offered this information to the
public.
It
is extraordinary to realize that our human consciousness is the infinitesimal
spark of cosmic light that is enabling the universe to reveal itself
to us. Without our capacity to imagine, observe, measure, deduce and
reflect, we could not know that everything we are, everything on our
planet and in our solar system, has been formed from elements of the
stars that have been seeded here from great galaxies millions of light
years away from us. It seems nothing less than incredible that we are
the agents through which the universe is coming to know itself on this
planet and that we are, in our essence, literally cosmic fire, cosmic
light, cosmic energy in every cell of our being. The universe that we
see and the life that we are arises from an invisible sea of being which
is the deep cosmic ground of the phenomenal world and our own consciousness.
The world we know is like a minute excitation on the surface of this
cosmic sea.
All
this is awe-inspiring, yet one of the most amazing discoveries is that
although we are between thirteen and fifteen billion years away from
the apparent beginning of our universe, nevertheless we exist at the
very heart of it. Every cell of our bodies as well as every star, every
galaxy, is the place where the universe is continuously flaring forth
into existence from the great sea of being. We do not see the source-ground—only
its manifestations. Listen to these words of cosmologist Brian Swimme
from his book, The Hidden Heart of the Cosmos: “Even
in the darkest region beyond the Great Wall of galaxies, even in the
void between the superclusters, even in the gaps between the synapses
of the neurons in the brain, there occurs an incessant foaming, a flashing
flame, a shining-forth-from and a dissolving-back-into.”(6)
We
are not just in the universe; at the very core of our being we are an
ongoing creation of the universe, participating, however unconsciously,
in this continuous creation. That is surely enough to set the imagination
on fire even if we feel insignificant in relation to the unimaginable
vastness of the visible universe. It astonishes me to think that it
took billions of years for life on this planet to evolve to the point
where it could provide the atmosphere and environment that could sustain
our physical organism and, ultimately, facilitate the development of
the kind of consciousness we now have. The
fiery magma of the earth's core and the ninety-two types of atoms derived
from the furnaces of the stars live within us. The chemical compounds
that constitute all forms of life, from the simplest bacteria and molecules,
live within the complex organism that we are. This organism, or the
physical aspect of it evolved from animal and plant, rock and sea and
the fiery magma of the earth’s core. Each human body consists
of 10,000 trillion atoms, connected to each other in ways we do not
yet fully understand. Whether we are aware of it or not we carry all
this cosmic and planetary evolution in the cells of our physical organism.
In every cell of our being, we are star-life, star-energy. And we are
the only species on this planet to have conscious awareness of this.
Our Planetary Roots
It
is very moving to reflect on the immense age of this planet where, taking
an hour's walk, every large step represents 10 million years. Our human
species appears in the last second of this walk—the final two
inches of earth or grass under our feet. And human consciousness as
we know it today? In perhaps the last millimetre or even less—the
width of a hair’s breadth. Our physical brain, the vehicle of
consciousness, has apparently arisen out of the evolutionary experience
of the earth and all species to which it has given life. But consciousness
itself may be an expression of cosmic consciousness, something of which
we are just beginning to become aware. Could the consciousness of our
species evolve further? It is conceivable that, as the great sages of
India have long taught, our species as a whole is still at a pre-conscious
or semi-conscious state, with its further development unrealized because
it is not envisaged. All the immense repository of knowledge we have
now accumulated serves the aims of a human mind that is still not fully
developed and is unrelated to a deeper cosmic ground. Thanks to the
discoveries of science, we now know a great deal about the evolution
of the physical aspect of life, but almost nothing about the inner aspect
of both the universe and ourselves—that is to say, the consciousness
aspect, only that our species and our capacity for self-awareness have
come into being very recently in relation to the time span of the earth’s
evolution. Yet this capacity is in itself utterly extraordinary, for
without it, the life of nature and of ourselves would have gone unnoticed
- extending from an unimagined past into an unimagined future.
The
planet itself has survived five giant catastrophes which threatened
to destroy all life on earth, the best known one being the devastating
impact of a huge meteorite which wiped out the dinosaurs some sixty-five
million years ago. But two hundred and fifty million years ago for reasons
not yet fully understood, the deep ocean conveyor currents stopped moving,
causing a lack of oxygen which nearly extinguished all life on earth.
The oceans turned stagnant and gave out a poisonous gas called hydrogen
sulphide—as deadly as cyanide. Almost every living thing died
on land as well as in the sea. This was the greatest extinction in the
earth’s history. Over ninety percent of all life on earth died.
Yet incredibly, life survived these and other catastrophes and regenerated
itself. It is truly astonishing that out of these successive extinctions
and regenerations, human consciousness eventually came into being. But
it is a sobering thought that, according to the biologist Sir David
Attenborough, our species, if it continues on its present course, could
be responsible for the sixth great extinction which could include ourselves.
The Evolution of Human Consciousness
Exactly
how our species – homo sapiens sapiens - evolved from
earlier hominids is not yet completely understood. But scientists and
anthropologists seem to have arrived at a consensus that our species
appeared around 500,000 years ago. In order for this to happen, it was
necessary for the hominid brain to triple in size and for the female
pelvis to expand to allow the birth of infants with a larger skull,
although there seems as yet to be no adequate explanation of what caused
this enormous change. Approximately a million years ago an extra pound
of neural tissue increased the size of the brain, leading to the differentiation
of the functions of the two brain hemispheres—a differentiation
that is unique to humans. Although animals also have bi-polar brains
they do not have the corpus callosum—the dense bridge
of 300 million nerve fibres which connects the two hemispheres or lobes
of our neo-cortical brain. Women today have between 10 and 33 percent
more of these neuronal fibres than men. This may make it easier for
them to develop lateral thinking and to be able to move between the
left and right hemispheres, between rational and intuitive or imaginative
thinking.
During
this million years the frontal lobes of the neo-cortex developed, making
possible the development of our capacity to think and to reflect on
our thoughts and feelings. A vastly expanded nervous system enabled
speech to develop. The left hemisphere of the neo-cortex was a crucial
new sense organ that facilitated the development of speech and could
perceive time, sequence and duration. The human brain only weighs three
to four pounds but contains a hundred billion neurons—about the
same number as the stars in the Milky Way. The anatomical development
of the human brain is thought to have been complete between 100,000
and 50,000 years ago. We know from the recent discovery of the Chauvet
cave in the Vaucluse area of France that the people of that time were
superb artists but we don't know how or when this ability developed,
only that it had reached the level of genius by 32,000 BC.
We
know today that the right frontal lobe, which governs the left side
of the body, is the oldest of the two hemispheres and the first to develop
out of the actual heart of the embryo. It is fairly mature before the
left lobe even comes into being. It seems that the close relationship
between the heart and the right hemisphere is maintained throughout
life and that this hemisphere functions through image cognition, visual-spatial
perception and mediating feeling states rather than through the verbal,
analytical, sequential cognition of the left hemisphere. The right hemisphere,
tied in to millions of years of the evolution of the earth and of our
species, is the image-making, holistic, non-verbal connective system
to the older mammalian brain (see below). This brain, which is undoubtedly
the one that shamans can access, gives us a different perspective on
life, grounded in empathic relationship with it. It is apparently through
the right brain that poets, mystics, musicians and scientific geniuses
receive their inspiration, their intuitive flashes of insight. Einstein's
theory of relativity came to him when he was sitting on a hill imagining
that he was riding a sunbeam to the edge of the universe and returning
towards the sun. The image came first, the theory later. Einstein himself
said “Imagination is more important than knowledge: knowledge
points to all that is; Imagination points to all that will be.”(7)
It may be that the imagination, focused through the right hemisphere,
is the illuminator of reality, the faculty which Coleridge held to be
the very ground of our consciousness, of our capacity to think, to discover
and to create.
The
left hemisphere governs the right side of the body and does not have
the same primordial connection to our distant planetary past because
it evolved relatively recently. The left hemisphere gives us focus,
direction, and the power to analyse, assemble facts, and direct our
intentions towards a goal. But it poses a problem for us because it
creates the illusion of time, taking us out of a state of “being”
into a linear awareness of past, present and future. When this hemisphere
is too dominant and controlling, it can shut out the perceptions of
the right hemisphere and with it, the imagination and the vital connection
to the heart, causing us to regress into the literal-mindedness and
single vision of Newton’s sleep.
Given
how extraordinary all this is, it invites us to understand the evolutionary
structure of our consciousness in greater depth. It may be a surprise
to discover that we have not one but three brains: the great frontal
dome of the neo-cortex—our most recently developed brain, rests
on the primordial root of two older brain systems which continuously
interact with each other and also with the far more recently developed
neo-cortical brain.
The Triune Brain
Paul
MacLean, who advanced this theory in 1974 in his book, The Triune
Brain explains:
A comparison of the brains of
existing vertebrates, together with an examination of the fossil record,
indicates that the human forebrain [neo-cortex] has evolved and expanded
to its great size while retaining the features of three basic evolutionary
formations that reflect an ancestral relationship to reptiles, early
mammals, and recent mammals. Radically different in chemistry and
structure and in an evolutionary sense countless generations apart,
the three neural assemblies constitute a hierarchy of three-brains-in-one,
a triune brain…Stated in popular terms, the three evolutionary
formations might be imagined as three interconnected biological computers,
with each having its own special intelligence, its own subjectivity,
its own sense of time and space, and its own memory, motor, and other
functions. (8)
So
we carry within us the evolutionary structure of three different brain
systems: the reptilian, the paleo-mammalian and the neo-mammalian or
neo-cortical brain. The incredible complexity of how these three brains
interact with each other and yet function as a single unit is still
one of the great mysteries of neuro-science. With great conscious effort
and practise, we can become aware of which is predominant in a specific
situation. We know, for instance, that the fight/flight reflexes of
the oldest reptilian brain spring into action when we are faced with
a threat. And we know that the older brain systems have a far greater
influence on the more recently evolved neo-cortical brain than the latter
has on the former. Powerful primal emotions like fear, anxiety and rage—mediated
through a part of the brain called the amygdala—can easily influence
and even overwhelm the neo-cortical “rational” mind. We
also know that adverse conditions in childhood can negatively imprint
the nervous system (the older brain) and interfere with and even inhibit
the development of the neo-cortical brain. A child so affected may remain
fixated in the purely instinctive older brain, unable to develop the
capacity for thought and reflection and the ability to contain and control
emotions.
All
the knowledge we have gained about the evolution of our physical bodymind
organism, as well as its consciousness aspect, does not acknowledge
the presence and influence of the unconscious part of the psyche—what
Jung called the “root and rhizome of the soul” — all
the multi-layered memories of the entire evolutionary experience that
we carry within us: memories of cellular life, plant life, reptilian,
mammalian and, finally, human life. (9) This complex
patterning of species memory as well as species form, incrementally
expanding and increasing over thousands of millennia has contributed
to the evolution of planetary life, the evolution of our species and,
finally, the evolution of human consciousness itself. We are the only
species on this planet that can speak, write, reflect, discover, create
and communicate with each other in words and gestures and give expression
to our imagination and our skills in beautiful artefacts, exquisite
musical forms and brilliant technological inventions such as the Hubble
telescope. How and why has this come about if the universe has no purpose
or meaning?
What is Consciousness?
Consciousness
is the ability to observe and connect with the visible world through
the five senses and simultaneously to hold awareness of an invisible
inner world of images, thoughts, feelings and ideas. It is also the
capacity to evaluate these, to make a distinction between what is meaningful
and what is not, what is safe and agreeable and what is not. The triune
brain gives rise to many integrated layers or levels of consciousness
that have arisen out of very archaic instincts. Over millennia, as the
triune brain developed, adding in the neo-cortical frontal lobes, the
amplification of primordial instincts gave rise to the possibility of
cognition and self-awareness and the extraordinary creative power of
the imagination as well as to specific emotions, empathic feelings,
and intuitive “flashes” of insight or associations. Beneath
the “superstructure” of consciousness, the subconscious
workings of the autonomic nervous system maintain the balance or homeostasis
of our total physical organism, supporting the relationship between
the heart and the head. What we call our “rational mind”
is only one part of our total consciousness which must also include
the dreaming mind. Our understanding of what comprises consciousness
will need to be continually revised as we discover more. For example,
Candace Pert's remarkable discovery of the “molecules of emotion”
(1998) which connect every part of our organism to every other part
has revolutionised our understanding of the interaction between mind
and body and done away with the arbitrary separation that had been established
between them. As she explains in an article that followed the publication
of her book Molecules of Emotion:
In the end, I find I can't separate
brain from body. Consciousness isn't just in the head. Nor is it a
question of mind over body. If one takes into account the DNA directing
the dance of the peptides, the body is the outward manifestation of
the mind. The new science of psycho-neuro-immunology is redefining
the connection between mind and body. We can no longer speak of body
and mind as separate systems or entities. Bodymind - one word, no
hyphen. Bodymind is a single organism pulsing with neuropeptide messengers
that flow in a continuous loop from the brain to every cell in our
body, giving rise to emotions and responding to emotions. (10)
Are
these extraordinary creative abilities no more than random expressions
of the neurons in our brain or is the brain a vehicle for the greater
“mind” of the cosmos? Neurobiologists assume that the ability
to imagine, invent and discover, to appreciate beauty and to wonder
has its origin in certain areas of the physical brain and they are trying
to pin-point these areas and measure the neural correlates of specific
subjective states. But our highly developed physical bodymind organism
could also act as a vehicle or transmitter of a greater cosmic mind.
And what of the heart that we can now recognise as a “feeling”
brain connected to the “thinking” one by the sympathetic
and parasympathetic branches of the autonomic nervous system? What does
the extraordinary electro-magnetic field of the heart, extending between
15 and 25 feet beyond the body connect us to? (www.heartmath.org) What
gives rise in us to the longing to understand ourselves and the life
around us? Is it only a random neural cause giving rise to a random
neural effect? Or do our longings originate with the soul of the cosmos
itself so that these — a further development of our primordial
instincts — actually embody and carry the evolutionary intention
of the cosmos?
The Separation from Nature and the Longing for
Reunion
For
countless millennia the potential for human consciousness was hidden
within planetary life—like a seed buried in the earth. Then, very
slowly, our species began to differentiate itself from the matrix of
nature and develop the capacity for self-awareness. We can understand
this evolutionary step of separation more easily when we observe the
life of a child who, as it separates at birth from its mother, recapitulates
the immense evolutionary advance of emerging from the matrix of nature,
slowly becoming aware of itself as an individual, distinct from its
mother.
Our
evolutionary separation from nature means that although we may have
nearly the same DNA as many other mammals we have evolved a different
kind of consciousness, since we are able to communicate our thoughts
and feelings through complex language and complex physical actions such
as learning to play a musical instrument.
Yet,
the more our mental and technological skills have developed, giving
us ever greater power to control our lives and our environment, the
more estranged we have become from a sense of relationship and communion
with the life around us. We seem to have forgotten the fact, summed
up in James Lovelock’s words that “So closely coupled is
the evolution of living organisms with the evolution of their environment
that together they constitute a single evolutionary process.”(11)
Indigenous
cultures have always known that life is not a competitive struggle for
survival but a sacred organism of connection and cooperation. In the
much-quoted words of Chief Seattle, “The Earth does not belong
to man, man belongs to the Earth. All things are connected like the
blood that unites us all. Man did not weave the web of life. He is merely
a strand in it.”
No-one
has written more eloquently about the earth and our lost relationship
with it than Thomas Berry in his book The Dream of the Earth.
No-one has evoked in such compelling language the need for human sensitivity,
compassion and intelligence in our relationship with the earth and its
living systems. He asks that we wake up from our mythic dream of progress
and the dominance of nature and take on the role of becoming responsible
custodians of the dwindling species and resources of the planet. For,
as he observes, “Suddenly we awaken to the devastation that has
resulted from the entire modern process…In relation to the earth,
we have been autistic for centuries.”(12)
The
competitive and exhausting industrial and technological culture we have
created, where so many millions of people live in enormous, ugly and
amorphous cities, stands like a tyrant over and against nature, over
and against the earth and whatever threatens our supremacy as a species.
Our human species as a part has become detached from planetary life
as the whole. There is an abysmal ignorance that, as Berry points out,
the earth is primary and our survival is dependent on the continued
integrity and balance of the earth’s inter-related systems:
If the supreme disaster in the
comprehensive story of the earth is our present closing down of the
major life systems of the planet, then the supreme need of our times
is to bring about a healing of the earth through this mutually enhancing
human presence to the earth community. To achieve this mode of pressure,
a new type of sensitivity is needed, a sensitivity that is something
more than romantic attachment to some of the more brilliant manifestations
of the natural world, a sensitivity that comprehends the larger patterns
of nature, its severe demands as well as its delightful aspects, and
is willing to see the human diminish so that other lifeforms might
flourish. (13)
Precisely
because of the long experience of separation from nature, we carry a
deep and unrecognised wound. Our very being has been fragmented by the
way we have interpreted reality and by the values that direct our culture
and, in particular, our science. Our conscious, rational mind has become
disconnected from the part of us that, at an unconscious, instinctive
level, is still bound in close relationship to the greater organism
of planetary life. This inevitably creates conflict within us. The end
result of this long process of separation is that in our technologically
advanced culture we have lost something absolutely vital that earlier
cultures still had—a sense of relationship with a sacred earth
and a sacred cosmos. While indigenous shamanic cultures have somehow
retained this ancient participatory awareness, the modern industrialised
world has totally lost it.
The
English artist the late Cecil Collins commented in despair, “Our
civilisation is the only one in the whole history of mankind not to
be based on a metaphysical reality… a metaphysical reality which
is unknowable, absolute, and yet a reality which can have a relationship
with us, and we with it. Our civilisation therefore can be considered
abnormal.” (14) Yet, he could also see that
“Beneath our technological civilisation, there still flows the
living river of human consciousness within which is concentrated in
continuity the life of the kingdoms of animals, plants, stars, the earth
and the sea, and the life of our ancestors, the flowing generations
of men and women as they flower in their brief and often tragic beauty:
the sensitive and the solitary ones, the secret inarticulate longing
before the mystery of life.” (15)
Astronauts of the Soul
In
a secular culture, attention has been focused exclusively on the daylight
world of physical reality. There is no awareness, as there was in earlier
cultures, of the existence of a dimension of reality which might be
compared to the starry night sky—a dimension which can only reveal
its presence when the sun's bright radiance is dimmed. But questions
are beginning to be asked which could open our minds to a different
concept of reality. Does consciousness originate within or beyond the
brain? If within the brain, how does the brain create consciousness?
If beyond the brain, is the universe conscious? And if so, can we enter
into relationship and dialogue with that greater consciousness of which
our own may be a still incompletely developed expression. If we could
open our mind to a different concept of reality, perhaps we could play
a more enlightened role in relation to the extraordinary cosmic drama
in which we are involved.
There
are brilliant pioneers now exploring the sub-atomic world as well as
the immensities of the visible universe revealed by the Hubble telescope
and there are others whom I call astronauts of the soul who are exploring
an invisible universe whose existence is not recognized or even imagined
by mainstream science. Just as we have the capacity to imagine, to think
and to feel — an “inside”dimension of thoughts and
feelings within our physical form — so the universe may also have
an “inside” to its visible form, an intelligence and a soul.
As the shamanic cultures knew millennia ago, we can develop the capacity
to communicate with this intelligence, to align ourselves with it and
to be guided by it. In the words of Christopher Bache, one of these
astronauts of the soul, it comes down to this:
Thinking we are the most intelligent,
the most evolved life form thrown up by a foaming, mechanical univeerse,
we commune only with ourselves and keep the cold world at bay. But
if we were to open to a world in which we recognized the blazing intelligence
of the cosmic womb that birthed us and everything we see around us,
if we began to glimpse the scale and scope of her project and the
depth of love that underwrites it, we would turn and face this mysterious
world... We would build up commerce with it until contact deepened
into communion, and communion is a sacramental exchange that transforms
both parties. With this pivot, history would turn. We would begin
to value and cultivate the skills of alignment. We would begin to
recognize the symptoms of misalignment in individuals, in institutions
and ideologies. (16)
Notes:
1. The Varieties of Religious Experience, Longmans. Green and
Co. London, New York 1929, p. 388
2. Andrew Harvey, A Journey in Ladakh, Jonathan Cape Ltd.,
1983, p. 167
3. William Blake, letter to Thomas Butts, 22 November, 1802, Complete
Poetry and Prose, ed. Geoffrey Keynes, p. 862
4. John Ralston Saul, The Unconscious Civilization, House of
Anansi Press, Canada, 1995 and Penguin Books, London, 1998
5. Sir Martin Rees, Before the Beginning, Simon & Schuster 1997,
p.
6 . Brian Swimme, The Hidden Heart of the Cosmos, Orbis Books,
New York, 1996, p. 101
7. Einstein,
8 . Paul MacLean, The Triune Brain in Evolution, Plenum Press,
New York, 1990, p. 9
9. C.G. Jung, Memories, Dreams, Reflections, p. 4
10. Candace Pert, Molecules of Emotion, Simon and Schuster,
London 1998, passim
11. James Lovelock, Healing Gaia, Harmony Books, New York 1991,
p. 222.
12. Thomas Berry, The Dream of the Earth, Sierra Books, San
Francisco, 1988, p. 215
13. Thomas Berry, The Dream of the Earth, Sierra Books, San
Francisco, 1988, p. 212
14. Cecil Collins, Angels, p. 38
15. Cecil Collins, Tate Gallery Retrospective Exhibition Catalogue,
p. 37
16. Mind Before Matter, O Books, Ropley, Hampshire, 2009, p.
279
.
------
------ 