The cosmic battle between Light and Darkness, Good and
Evil, reflected in the hero's fight with a dragon, monster or serpent,
is the dominant myth of the solar era. As I hope to explain in this
and the next two chapters, it presided over the split between nature
and spirit and between mind and body. It gave rise to the idea that
man is engaged in a great battle to subdue and control nature. Ultimately
this led to the split between ourselves as the observer and the whole
field of what we observe and between the rational mind and everything
it has designated as non-rational.
What
wider cultural influences led to the loss of lunar participatory consciousness?
Why, in his book Apocalypse and Other Writings (1931), did
D.H. Lawrence despairingly write,
We have lost the cosmos, by
coming out of responsive connection with it, and this is our chief
tragedy... We and the cosmos are one. The cosmos is a vast living
body of which we are still parts... What is our petty little love
of nature—Nature!!—compared to the ancient magnificent
living with the cosmos, and being honoured by the cosmos! (1)
To
understand why we have lost the cosmos, we have to look back some 4000
years and explore the rise of a new solar meta-narrative. From around
2000 BC, we begin to see the development of a new phase in the evolution
of human consciousness and a change of focus from a lunar to a solar
meta-narrative. This era, which has been equated with the “rise
of civilization” actually reflects a complete eclipse of the participatory
worldview of the lunar age, taking over many of the older myths and
stories and setting them in a new solar context. The dominant celestial
body is now the sun and the dominant mythology is solar rather than
lunar. The primary theme of lunar mythology is on transformation through
a cyclical process of life, death and regeneration. The primary theme
of solar mythology is the great battle between a hero and a dragon,
symbolizing the battle between light and darkness, good and evil and,
ultimately, man conquering nature and the triumph of good over evil.
Whereas the focus of lunar culture is on the soul and mythic participation
in the life of a sacred earth and the vast living body of the cosmos,
the focus of solar culture is on the conquest and mastery of an increasingly
inanimate nature, the development of the rational mind and the differentiation
of the warrior-leader or outstanding individual from the tribal group.
In lunar culture it is the survival of the group that is of primary
importance; in solar culture the focus is increasingly on the outstanding
individual although the group maintains its importance.
As
this process of solarization develops, linear time begins to replace
cyclical time, and a linear, literal and objective way of thinking slowly
replaces the older instinctive participatory way of knowing and its
symbolic, imaginal way of thinking. It is customary to think of this
new era of ‘civilization’ as a progressive advance or ascent
for humanity emerging from an older and more ‘primitive’
era, characterized by savage customs and ‘magical’ thinking,
but I see it as a time of tragic and ever-increasing loss. A most interesting
book by Richard Rudgley, Lost Civilisations of the Stone Age,
published in 1999, details the very ancient origins—going back
to the Neolithic and even the Palaeolithic era—of many of the
discoveries and innovations that were thought to originate in the historical
era. (2) His research, as well as Marshack’s,
shows that people were capable of complex thought processes millennia
before these were considered to be possible and that this reveals the
profound and long-lasting connections that they made between the human
community, the earth and the life of the cosmos.
The Separation from Nature and
the New Image of a Male Deity
As
the human psyche draws further and further away from nature in the solar
era, the predominant image of spirit changes from Great Mother to Great
Father. The greater the withdrawal from nature, the more transcendent
and disengaged from nature becomes the image of deity. In The Myth
of the Goddess, we summed up this primary change of consciousness:
“If the relation to nature as the Mother is one of identity, and
the relation to nature from the Father is one of dissociation, then
the movement from Mother to Father symbolizes an ever-increasing separation
from a state of containment in nature, experienced no longer as nurturing
to life but as stifling to growth.” (3)
Divine immanence, once associated with the image of the Great Mother,
is lost. The mind is focused on the realm of intellectual ideas; philosophy
becomes discourse on these ideas rather than, as in the time of Parmenides
and the Pre-Socratic philosophers, relationship with an invisible reality.
The lunar emphasis on the importance of the group carries through into
institutionalized religion with its insistence on collective belief.
Faith replaces shamanic experience of and connection with the Otherworld
and the practices and rituals which celebrated and kept alive that connection.
The changeover from a lunar mythology and culture to a solar one takes
thousands of years but eventually, the spirits that had once inhabited
and guarded every grove and spring, river and mountain, are banished;
with Judaism, Christianity and Islam, pagan rites are outlawed. These
religions are not aware of what they have lost or on what ancient foundations
they rest.
There
were two major factors contributing to this change: one was political,
the other the impact of literacy. Around 2000 BC there was a tremendous,
devastating change—like a thunderbolt in a blue sky as the Middle
East and the eastern Mediterranean were thrown into turmoil. Invaders
bringing sky gods — “a people whose onslaught was like a
hurricane”— swept into the agricultural communities and
river valleys where the Great Mother had been worshipped for thousands
of years. They brought with them the horse and the war chariot. Some
came from the north, others from the Arabian desert. War and conquest
became the theme of a new and terrifying age. Everywhere there was fear
and slaughter; everywhere a great cry of terror and distress as people
were murdered, enslaved, their homes and livelihoods destroyed.
There
may have been other factors contributing to this change, such as famine
in the areas from which these invaders came that made people move in
large numbers into areas which could provide food. (4)
Whatever the cause, Joseph Campbell describes this time as “The
Great Reversal”. (5) Thorkild Jacobsen,
an authority on Mesopotamian religion, writes that while the fourth
millennium and the ages before it had been moderately peaceful and wars
and raids were not constant, “In the third millennium they appear
to have become the order of the day. No one was safe…queens and
great ladies like their humble sisters faced the constant possibility
that the next day might find them widowed, torn from home and children,
and enslaved in some barbarous household.” (6)
The terrible cruelty and massive human sacrifice that accompanied the
ethnic cleansing of that time is minutely documented in the annals of
the Babylonian and later, the Assyrian kings. King Sargon of Akkad (2300
BC) was the first proudly to proclaim it. The disappearance of ten of
the twelve tribes of Israel ca. 720 BC is part of this sombre story.
The sack of Troy gives us graphic insight into the focus on war which
dominates this era and all subsequent ones.
In
this new act in the drama of our evolutionary journey, the Great Mother
moves into the wings; sky gods brought by the invaders and — ultimately
— the Great Father, move center stage. In Greece the goddesses
Athena, Artemis, Aphrodite, and Persephone, who as goddesses in their
own right once personified aspects of the Great Mother's powers, now
become daughters of Zeus. Of the Greek goddesses, only Demeter, Hera
and Gaia retain something of the status of the former Great Mother.
Hera was once the Great Goddess whose temple at the foot of Mount Euboia
presided over the whole plain of Argos. To the Greeks of this time,
her temple was like the Temple in Jerusalem to the people of Israel—the
sanctuary for the whole land. (7) Now, as described
in the Iliad, Hera is demoted to the jealous, nagging and manipulative
wife of Zeus.
In
the Near East, the Great Father replaces the Great Mother as the creator
of life. The story of the ferocious struggle between the supporters
of the two mythologies is told in the Old Testament which repeatedly
documents the destruction of the shrines and groves of the goddess.
“But ye shall destroy their altars, break their images and cut
down their groves: For thou shalt worship no other god: for the Lord,
whose name is Jealous, is a jealous god.” (Exod. 34:13) This was
the earliest known example of Iconoclasm or the destruction of images.
All images of and references to the goddess were eradicated. King Hezekiah
in 721 BC and King Josiah in 623 BC threw the statue of the goddess
Asherah out of the Temple and with it the great bronze serpent that
was part of her cult. At approximately the same time, approximately
from the tenth to the eighth century BC, the Myth of the Fall in the
Book of Genesis was formulated, probably by the priests who served Yahweh.
This myth effectively demoted the Goddess into the human figure of Eve.
In this way Judaic monotheism eradicated polytheism and with it the
connection to nature. Myth was replaced by a new linear emphasis on
history as divine revelation. The Hebrew language to this day has no
word for goddess.
An Evolutionary Change of Focus
It
is impossible to overstate the importance of this change of focus for
the future relationship between man and nature. The coming of the solar
era reflects the formulation of an entirely new perception of life and
with it the rise of a new meta-narrative, based on the idea of a cosmic
battle between light and darkness. With the diffusion of solar mythology,
hastened by the advent of literacy and the discovery of the many applications
of bronze technology — particularly those related to arms and
war — the earlier lunar sense of the mythic participation of communities
in the continual regeneration of the life of the earth and the greater
life of the cosmos gradually fades. For the next four thousand years,
nature becomes something to be conquered, controlled and manipulated
by human ingenuity, to human advantage. Earth, once alive with spirit,
is desouled. Body is disconnected from mind and mind from soul. The
Myth of the Fall describes the process of estrangement, separation and
loss—a stark reversal of the participatory way of knowing that
characterised older, pre-literate lunar cultures. Above all, as Jules
and I observed in The Myth of the Goddess, “Nature is
no longer experienced as source but as adversary, and darkness is no
longer a mode of divine being, as it was in the lunar cycles, but a
mode of being devoid of divinity and actively hostile, devouring of
light, clarity and order.” (page 298)
The
great myth of the solar era is that of the heroic individual engaged
in battle with a dragon, monster or serpent of the underworld. The solar
hero and the warrior-kings or great spiritual leaders of this era, such
as the Buddha or Christ, are identified with the sun. If we relate this
process of solarization to what is happening within the psyche of that
time, we can read the story of the human ego — the focus of our
developing consciousness — striving to differentiate itself from
the matrix of nature and attempting to master and control that from
which it had emerged. The drama of the solar quest for light and enlightenment
and victory over darkness is the drama of our own quest for consciousness
and our fear of falling back into the darkness of unconsciousness. From
the ego’s perspective, the darkness had to be overcome for the
light to prevail, a concept utterly different from the earlier belief
where the darkness was a mystery to be entered and explored.
The
primary theme of solar mythology is empowerment, ascent, achievement,
conquest, carried through to our own day in Bronowski's famous documentary
television series in the mid-sixties, The Ascent of Man, which
aimed to show the whole spectrum of discoveries and inventions that
revealed “man’s ability to control nature, not to be controlled
by it”. Solar mythology has helped the gifted or heroic individual
to differentiate himself from the tribal group, bestowing many benefits
on humanity. However, ultimately, it has also encouraged the belief
that humanity itself is the solar hero, standing above all other species
and having the right to exploit the resources of the earth for its own
exclusive benefit, leaving other species defenseless against the onslaught
of its perceived rights and needs.
This
belief was enshrined in the Book of Genesis, where, in Genesis 1:28,
Adam and Eve are granted dominion over the earth. “And God blessed
them and said to them, ‘Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the
earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea and
over the birds of the air and over every living thing that moves upon
the earth.’” In another fateful passage in Genesis 9:1-2,
Noah and his sons are told to “be fruitful and multiply and fill
the earth. The fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every
beast of the earth, and upon every bird of the air, upon everything
that creeps upon the ground and all the fish of the sea; into your hand
they are delivered.” The legacy of these two passages has been
catastrophic, both for man and for the earth.
In
the West, solar mythology has been the driving inspiration behind the
Promethean quest for freedom, justice and knowledge as well as power
and control. In the sphere of religion, a major theme of solar mythology
is escape from the bondage of the body and, by association, release
from the bondage of mortality. As a cultural impulse, it carries with
it the human longing, the human drive, to go beyond all constraints
and limitations, to reach higher, progress further, discover more. But
it is a linear and essentially utopian and transcendent mythology rather
than one that relates us to earth and cosmos.
Solar
mythology drives both utopian ideologies and the dream of scientific
progress. It is overwhelmingly male because the male psyche has been
the dominant influence in the world during the solar era, and it is
the achievements, discoveries and heroic actions of exceptional men
which have inspired and offered a role model to other men. A strong
sense of individuality and a focused ego — which ultimately came
to be identified with the conscious, rational mind — can be acknowledged
as the supreme achievement of the male psyche during the solar era.
But the voice of women who, in the developing patriarchal cultures,
were denied access to education, the priesthood and the healing profession
was silenced. And the older, participatory relationship with nature
and the cosmos was irrevocably and disastrously lost. This is when we
“lost the cosmos”.
We
have developed a formidable intellect, a formidable science, a formidable
technology but all rest on the premise of our alienation from and mastery
of nature, where nature was treated as object with ourselves as controlling
subject. Despite its phenomenal cultural and technological achievements
the whole edifice of the solar age and Western civilization rests on
the foundation of the separation from nature and, within the psyche,
the split between our conscious rational mind and our instinctive soul.
Only now are we brought face to face with the legacy of this dual separation,
with perhaps sufficient consciousness to recognize and heal it.
The Fear of and Subjugation of Women
The
polarizing emphasis derived from a mythology of the battle between light
and darkness, gradually created a fissure between spirit and nature,
mind and body, which defined religious doctrine, cultural attitudes
and social customs. During this solar phase in the evolution of consciousness,
the male psyche identified itself with the supremacy of spirit and mind
over nature, woman and body. It came to associate the former with the
image of light and order and the latter with the image of darkness and
chaos. Woman and the body began to be viewed as a danger, a threat,
a sexual temptation to man. Nature, woman and the body became closely
identified with each other—and for this reason all had to be subject
to the will of man. Woman, identified with nature, was named as an inferior
or secondary creation in the Book of Genesis and in the writings of
the Greek philosophers—a belief which will be explored in Chapters
Seven and Eight.
The
patriarchal religions of the solar era carry this polarized way of thinking
within their teaching, wherever this is associated with the ascetic
subjugation of the body, the mistrust of sexuality and the oppression
and persecution of woman. The unconscious identification of woman with
nature was the origin of the negative projections onto her that were
incorporated into the social attitudes and customs — fused with
religious beliefs — that endure to this day. Where does the Taliban’s
attitude to woman originate if not in this directive from the earliest
Mesopotamian codification of law, c. 2350 BC: “If a woman shall
speak out against her man, her mouth shall be crushed with a hot brick.”
Further
to the East, in China, the old Taoist vision of an ensouled nature also
began to withdraw, replaced by the emphasis on the minutae of social
custom which relegated women to an inferior and almost slave-like position.
The sages of India, with certain exceptions, turned away from the body
and sensory experience and held the phenomenal world to be an illusion,
placing the emphasis of their teaching on the experience of enlightenment
and release from the wheel of rebirth. Here again, woman was a hindrance
to and a distraction from the spiritual life. The famous story of the
Buddha leaving his wife and young son and even his beloved horse reflects
the influence of this new solar ideology where the emphasis was placed
on spirit in opposition to nature.
The Impact of Literacy
A
second major influence leading to the rise of solar culture was the
impact of literacy. The written word replaced the oral tradition that
had carried forward the wisdom and insights of the older lunar culture.
Some of that ancient wisdom may have been recorded in the scrolls held
in the Great Library of Alexandria. But in 391 AD the Emperor Theodosius
decreed that all pagan temples (including those at Eleusis and Ephesus)
should be destroyed. The legendary fire which is said to have destroyed
the library of Alexandria and with it many thousands of scrolls holding
the precious legacy of the pre-Christian world may have taken place
at this time. The older wisdom, particularly that derived from Egypt,
went underground, surviving in the Hermetic tradition, and in the mystical
teaching of Kabbalah and Alchemy.
David
Abram has shown in his book, The Spell of the Sensuous, how
the new emphasis on the written word contributed to the loss of the
older participatory consciousness: “Only as the written text began
to speak would the voices of the forest, and of the river, begin to
fade. And only then would language loosen its ancient association with
the invisible breath, the spirit sever itself from the wind, the psyche
dissociate itself from the environing air.” (8)
Another
book, The Alphabet and the Goddess, written by the late Leonard
Shlain, who was chief of laparoscopic surgery at California Medical
Center in San Francisco, develops the interesting idea that literacy
gave prominence to the left hemispheric brain to the detriment of the
balance between the hemispheres that had prevailed in a pre-literate
culture. He explains that when speaking, we use both hemispheres of
the brain but when “written words begin to supersede spoken words,
the left brain’s dominance markedly increased.” (9)
Writing represented a shift
of tectonic proportions that fissured the integrated nature of…brain
cooperation. Writing made the left brain, flanked by the incisive
cones of the eye and the aggressive right hand, dominant over the
right. The triumphant march of literacy that began five thousand years
ago conquered right-brain values and with them the Goddess. Patriarchy
and misogyny have been the inevitable result…The hand that held
the pen also held the sword. (10)
Perhaps
because literacy distanced us from nature and from empathic relationship
with the earth, the story of creation is now believed to be revealed
in the “word” of the transcendent father god. Creation no
longer emerges from the womb of the mother. This is a crucially important
distinction because the unity of life is again broken: invisible spirit
is expelled from nature. The earth is no longer sacred. Absolute obedience
to the written word replaces direct shamanic experience of the numinous.
Ancient rituals of connection and divination are forbidden. Pagan cult
images are banished under pain of death. With this shift in archetypal
imagery, everything formerly associated with the feminine archetype
(the Great Mother) is downgraded in relation to the masculine one (the
Great Father). The lunar way of knowing is subjugated to the solar way
and, under the influence of solar mythology, first nature, then the
cosmos, are de-souled.
As
the sun becomes the new focus of consciousness, the cultural hero is
no longer the lunar shaman who ventures into the darkness, assimilating
its mysteries and returning from it with the treasure of wisdom and
methods of healing with which to guide and help his community, but rather
the solar hero, often a king, warrior or outstanding individual, who
is celebrated as the one who conquers and overcomes darkness—a
darkness that increasingly becomes identified with his enemies. The
emphasis is now on the triumph of the light and the repudiation and
elimination of whatever or whoever is identified with darkness.
Solar Myth: the Cosmic Battle Between Light and Darkness
Solar
mythology celebrates the cosmic battle between Light and Darkness. As
solar mythology becomes the new focus of consciousness, it replaces
the earlier lunar mythology with its theme of transformation, death
and regeneration although it survives in the main features of the Christian
myth.
The
first story describing this mythic contest is in the Epic of Gilgamesh
which may have originated as early as ca. 2300 BC, although it was only
written down later. Gilgamesh, King of the Sumerian city of Uruk, defies
the express warning of the gods and sets out with his companion Enkidu
to kill Humbaba, the guardian of the great forest of the Goddess in
what is now the Lebanon. The two heroes will not listen to Humbaba’s
pleas for mercy and kill him. Soon after, Enkidu falls ill and dies.
Gilgamesh, grief-stricken, sets out to find the Herb of Immortality
but loses it on his way back to his city. So powerful is the description
in this ancient text that, as we read the words, we can still feel the
intense grief of his loss.
A
later Babylonian creation myth, (ca. 1700 BC), called the Enuma
Elish, tells the story of Marduk, a young god “clothed with
the radiance of ten gods, with a majesty to inspire fear” who
kills Tiamat, the great dragoness mother, by shooting an arrow into
her open mouth which tears her belly and splits her heart. Marduk throws
her carcass on the ground, crushes her skull with a blow of his mace
and cuts her body in half like a shell-fish, creating the sky from one
half and the earth from the other. He then creates the planets and the
constellations. Almost as an afterthought, he creates humanity from
the blood of Tiamat's murdered son.
This
is a new and violent creation myth, in stark contrast to older Sumerian
and Egyptian creation myths, and it reflects a loss of relationship
with the natural world and a harsh severance of the lunar way of thinking.
The Babylonian myth was a dangerous myth to take literally for it offered
the image of violence and murder as a pattern of divine behaviour and,
therefore, ratified it as a model for human beings to emulate. Marduk
becomes the macho ideal—the model for all conquerors to come.
With this myth the cyclical lunar time of the goddess culture ends.
Linear time begins, and death becomes final and terrifying. With this
myth the imagery of conflict and opposition between light and darkness,
good and evil is constellated. At the same time, in the context of war,
the practise of wholesale human sacrifice becomes widespread.
The
story of the Enuma Elish, widely disseminated throughout the
Middle and Near East, laid the mythological ground for the future polarization
of spirit and nature, mind and body—the one divine and good, the
other “fallen” and “evil”. This divinely sanctioned
opposition led also to the idea of the “holy war”—
the war of the forces of good against the forces of evil which is deeply
interwoven with the sacred texts of the three patriarchal religions
and with their behavior towards those enemies they identified with evil.
The victory of the solar god initiated a new way of living, a new way
of relating to the divine by identifying with an ideology that celebrated
the hero-god and his conquest of darkness and chaos. This theme became
the dominant one of all the hero myths of the solar era—from Gilgamesh
to Siegfried and even the hero myth of our own time that is being played
out before our eyes on the world stage in the battle against the “axis
of evil”.
This
imagery pervades the Old Testament and other mythologies of the Iron
Age—in India, the Mahabharata; in Persia, in the mythical
conflict between Ormuzd and Ahriman. We find the same theme reflected
in Greek myths, such as those describing the sun god Apollo’s
slaying of the she-dragon at Delphi, Theseus killing the Minotaur and
Perseus the Gorgon. All reflect the supremacy of the new solar mythology
over the older lunar one, represented by the image of the Great Mother.
Already, it is possible to sense that the earth—identified with
the goddess—is no longer sacred. It is a shocking thought that
one powerful myth and its derivatives could alter our relationship to
earth and cosmos and cast a spell that has endured for nearly four thousand
years. Only now is its influence being challenged with the realization
that the real battle is within our own nature and the need to shed light
upon the darkness of our own beliefs and behavior.
The Glorification of War
There
is another important aspect to solar mythology—one that is focused
on war and the goal of territorial conquest. The glorification of war
and conquest and the exaltation of the warrior is a major theme of the
solar era – still with us today in George W. Bush’s words:
“We will accept no outcome except victory”. this call to
victory echoes down the centuries, ensuring that hecatombs of young
men were sacrificed to the god of war. It has sanctified an ethos that
strives for victory at no matter what cost in human lives, and even
today glorifies war and admires the warrior leader. This archaic model
of tribal dominance and conquest has inflicted untold suffering on humanity
and now threatens our very survival as a species.
For
over 4000 years, under the powerful influence of solar mythology, war
and conquest were glorified; victory and the spoils of war seen as the
coveted treasure to be won in battle. Courage in battle became the supreme
virtue in the warrior and the role of the warrior was exalted as the
supreme role model for men. The archetype of the warrior still exerts
immense unconscious influence on the modern psyche. As people moved
to cities and cities became states, and states entered into conflict
with each other, more and more young men were conscripted into armies
led by warrior kings.
The
cosmic battle between light and darkness was increasingly projected
into the world and a fascination with territorial conquest gripped the
imagination and led to the creation of vast empires (Assyrian, Babylonian,
Persian, Greek, Roman—to mention only those of the West as opposed
to those of India and China). It is as if the heroic human ego, identified
with the solar hero, had to seek out new territories to conquer, had
to embody the myth in a literal sense. We hear very little about the
suffering generated by these conquests: the widows, the mothers who
lost sons, the children orphaned and the lands devastated by the foraging
armies passing over them.
In
the Christian era, solar mythology fuelled a missionary zeal to conquer
new lands for God or Christ, with catastrophic consequences for the
indigenous inhabitants of those lands—extending the injunction
in Genesis telling man to subdue the earth and to have dominion over
every living thing. It fuelled the desire of the West to create new
empires and it has fueled America’s drive for supremacy and its
desire to control the world and impose democracy “for its own
good”. George W. Bush’s much quoted words, “Those
who are not with us are against us” are a modern re-statement
of solar mythology.
This
celebration of conquest and supremacy begins in the third millennium
BC in Mesopotamia and Egypt with the conquests of Sargon of Akkad and
the Egyptian pharaohs and continues with Hiroshima, Vietnam, Iraq, and
the horrific nuclear, chemical and biological weapons of modern warfare.
The long chronicle of conquest and human sacrifice, of exultation in
power and the subjugation of enemies might truly be named the dark shadow
of the solar age. Wherever today we still find the tendency to omnipotence
and grandiose ambitions of empire and world domination we can discern
the influence of solar mythology and the inflation or hubris of leaders
who unconsciously identify themselves with the archetypal mythic role
of the solar god or hero engaging in the battle to defeat the dragon
of darkness and evil.
Solar Mythology and the Split between Ego and
Instinct
With
the psychological insight which has become available to us over the
last hundred years, particularly through the depth psychology of Jung,
we can understand that this solar phase of our evolution reflects a
radical dissociation within our psyche between the growing strength
of the ego (the hero) and the older and greatly feared power of instinct
(the dragon) that was identified with nature. As this dissociation gathers
momentum, so the feeling of containment within a greater cosmic entity
and the sense of relationship with nature and with an invisible dimension
of reality fades and with it, the participatory consciousness of an
earlier time. The legacy of the Platonic and Aristotelian emphasis on
reason and the rational mind, together with the impact of literacy and
the solar emphasis on ascent to the spirit, accompanied by a deep suspicion
of woman, sexuality and sensual experience, hastens the demise of the
lunar way of knowing and the former instinctive sense of relationship
with a sacred earth and a sacred cosmos. During this era, the left hemisphere
of the brain begins to assume a position of dominance in relation to
the right. The more literacy spreads, the more this tendency develops.
In
an evolutionary sense the supreme achievement of the solar era was the
emergence of a strong autonomous sense of individuality (conscious ego)
from the matrix of instinct and the development of the reflective, rational
mind in all who had access to education. But this had a high price:
firstly, the inflation of the ego as it drew away from its instinctive
ground and began to assimilate a god-like power to itself. Secondly,
the subjugation and repression of the instinctual, the non-rational
and the feminine which, identified with each other, were perceived as
threatening to the hegemony of the masculine ego.
The Danger of Utopian Ideologies: Negative Projections
onto the Dark, Inferior or Primitive Races
Solar
myth continues today. It is carried in all Utopian ideologies which
strive to impose the light (a new world order) and split off the darkness
(anything that opposes it). It entered not only into the sacred texts
of Judaism, Christianity and Islam but, most significantly, into our
behaviour towards the “dark” and so-called primitive (more
instinctual) indigenous peoples who fell victim to the race for empire
of the European nations. The catalogue of horror inflicted during the
course of the conquest of these “inferior” peoples, whether
in South and Central America, in Africa, India or further East, has
been minutely documented and it still continues in places like the Amazonian
and Indonesian rainforests. As time went on, religions, particularly
Christianity and Islam, took on the mantle of solar mythology in a militant
struggle for supremacy. The animosity between Catholic and Protestant
in European history and between Shi’a and Sunni in the Islamic
world may be traced to the polarizing influence of this mythology and,
more importantly, to the split in the psyche that underlies it. As long
as we are not aware of the fissure within our own nature, we will be
driven to seek out and attack an object on which to project our darkness.
This unconscious mechanism of projection still operates in the religio-political
sphere as illustrated by the ongoing tension between the Christian cultures
of the West and the Islamic cultures of the Middle East.
Finally,
solar mythology and its tendency to encourage negative projections onto
others is reflected in the secular totalitarian ideologies which ravaged
the last century when they separated the heroic race or ‘chosen’
people from those whom they demonized as inferior or expendable. We
can see this polarizing influence at work in the Holocaust where the
‘Aryan’ race exterminated millions of Jews and others who
were perceived as racially, genetically or mentally inferior. The same
influence can be found in the Communist regime of the former Soviet
Union, in Maoist China, in Cambodia under Pol Pot as well as, more recently,
in Rwanda and Zimbabwe. These ideologies justified the elimination of
racial, class or ethnic enemies, just as Christianity and Islam had
justified the elimination of heretics and apostates.
One
historical example of the polarizing tendencies within religion was
the decision of the Catholic Church to burn Giordano Bruno at the stake
in the Campo de’ Fiori in Rome in 1600 because of his insistence
that God or spirit permeated all of nature. Bruno, cosmologist, philosopher
and occultist who had a great influence on his contemporaries, published
a book in 1584 called On the Infinite Universe and Worlds.
In it he wrote: “There are countless constellations, suns and
planets; we see only the suns because they give light; the planets remain
invisible, for they are small and dark. There are also numberless earths
circling around their suns, no worse and no less than this globe of
ours.” Anticipating the search in our own time for intelligent
life in the cosmos, he also wrote, “No reasonable mind can assume
that heavenly bodies which may be far more magnificent than ours would
not bear upon them creatures similar or even superior to those upon
our human Earth.” Bruno was rehabilitated in 2000 during the Papacy
of John Paul II, when an acknowledgement of “profound sorrow”
at the error of his condemnation was made.
Islam
also murdered some of its greatest mystics, among them the Persian Suhrawardi
(1154-1191) who, during his short life, founded a School of Illumination.
He taught a complex and profound emanationist cosmology, seeing all
creation flowing through successive levels from a divine ground he named
the “Light of Lights”. The parallels between his cosmology
and that of Kabbalah are striking and fascinating.
We
can also recognize the polarizing influence of solar mythology at the
time of the Reformation when the new religion of Protestantism sought
to eradicate as much as it could of the evidence of the Catholic tradition
and turned against its sacred images with savage fury—leaving
thousands of churches whitewashed and unadorned. More than ninety-five
percent of the artistic heritage of the Middle Ages in England was destroyed
in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries when literally thousands
of superb sculptures and wooden images of Christ, the Virgin and the
saints were defaced, burnt and smashed to pieces by men who took pride
in their acts of vandalism that would wipe out all vestiges of “superstition”.
England has never recovered from this rape of her soul and the loss
of her supremely gifted artists and sculptors who celebrated God through
the creation of beauty. Some even had to endure the agony of seeing
their recent creations destroyed. It was at this time that the English
people were prohibited from worshipping the Virgin as they had done
for centuries. Churches were instructed to “sing no more praises
to Our Lady, only to Our Lord”.
A Catastrophic Loss of Soul
From
this brief survey of the era of solar mythology, it is possible to see
that the belief system of scientific materialism described in Chapter
Four which has so powerfully influenced modern secular culture, can
be understood as the end-result of the long-standing dissociation of
spirit and nature, mind and matter but, above all, the sundering within
us of thinking and feeling, rational mind and instinctive soul—the
solar and lunar, conscious and unconscious aspects of our nature. It
could be said that we are now perceiving reality through the linear
consciousness of the left hemisphere of the brain and have lost the
holistic and connective perception of the right hemisphere.Consequently,
our psyche and our culture are profoundly unbalanced.
Over
the four to five millennia since solar mythology became the dominant
influence on world culture, we have achieved an extraordinary advance
in scientific and technological skills and their application to improving
the conditions of human life on this planet, as well as a phenomenal
expansion of the ability to express ourselves as individuals in myriad
different fields of endeavour. But at the same time, we have suffered
a catastrophic loss of soul, a loss of the ancient instinctive awareness
of the sacred interweaving of all aspects of life, a loss of the sense
of participation in the life of nature and the cosmos, a loss of instinct
and imagination. Instinct, that we were once in touch with has now become
an enemy, driving us ever more relentlessly to achieve the shallow and
deficient goals set by our current worldview.
So
we come to the present time where, in a secular culture, the rational
human mind has established itself as the supreme value, master of all
it surveys, recognizing no power, no consciousness beyond itself. It
has lost its connection to soul, not only soul in the individual sense
but soul as a cosmic matrix or field in whose life we participate. In
its hubristic stance, the modern mind has become disconnected from the
deeper instinctive ground out of which it evolved. With all the passionate
conviction of the iconoclast who cannot tolerate the existence of anything
which threatens his or her belief, it denigrates and derides everything
it perceives as “superstition”.
This
attitude, I think, points to my dream of the tower-like iron structure
erected on the surface of the moon. It reflects the rigid stance of
the rational mind or ego which, cut off from its roots, stands like
a tyrant over and against nature, over and against the earth, over against
whatever it defines as threatening to its supremacy, the achievement
of its secular aims and its definition of progress. This leaves the
human heart lonely and afraid and the neglected territory of the soul
a wasteland as my dream of the barren and devastated surface of the
moon suggests. In our world, the projected rage and despair of the long
denied inner need to reconnect mind with soul confronts us in the form
of the enemies who seek to destroy us and whom we seek to destroy. We
struggle to contain the effects of a split psyche and a dysfunctional
way of thinking—believing that ever greater power and control
will enable us to eradicate the evils we have unwittingly brought into
being.
The Return of the Soul
Yet,
mysteriously and fortuitously, beneath the surface of our culture, the
ancient concept of soul and the unity of life is returning. The challenge
of the immense problems facing us is urging us to reflect on our current
understanding of reality and modify the oppositional paradigm we have
inherited from the influence of solar mythology. A deep human instinct
is attempting to restore balance and wholeness in us by re-discovering
the values rooted in an older way of knowing. One example of this is
the environmental movement which is restoring sacredness to the earth.
In his introduction to Frederick Turner’s Book, Beyond Geography,
The Western Spirit Against the Wilderness, T.H. Watkins writes
that “Our presence on this earth was not meant to be a conquest
but a sharing” and suggests that we can recover this lost knowledge
by re-encountering our own past: “If the environmental movement
succeeds in redeeming at least some of the damage our history has done,
future generations may view it as the most important social movement
of all time.” (11)
Compassion
is growing for those suffering from poverty, disease and the obscene
effects of war as well as anger on behalf of the indigenous peoples
of the world, whose lands have been so exploited by the territorial,
industrial and commercial greed of the West. Shamanic methods of healing
are being recovered, among them ancient methods of aligning ourselves
with the spirit of the earth. As a new image of reality struggles to
be born, we are beginning to recognize that we are poisoning the earth,
the seas and our own immune system with toxic chemicals and pesticides,
and inviting our destruction as a species as well as thousands of others
through our rapacious behavior towards the earth’s resources and
the uncontrolled proliferation of our own species.
Many
individuals are now awakening to awareness that we and the phenomenal
world that we call nature are woven into a cosmic tapestry whose threads
connect us not only with each other at the deepest level, but with other
dimensions or levels of reality and multitudes of beings inhabiting
those dimensions. Beyond the present limits of our sight, an immense
unseen field of consciousness interacts with our own, asking to be recognised
by us, embraced by us. What is emerging at the cutting edge of science
is a grand unified theory of quantum, cosmos, life and consciousness
where physics is reunited with metaphysics. (12)
As this deep soul-impulse gathers momentum, the “marriage”
of the re-emerging lunar values with the dominant solar ones is changing
our perception of reality. This gives us hope for the future. If we
can recover the values intrinsic to the ancient participatory way of
knowing without losing the priceless evolutionary attainment of a strong
and focused ego, we could heal both the fissure in our soul and our
raped and vandalized planet. In the words of D.H. Lawrence, “The
great range of responses that have fallen dead in us have to come to
life again. It has taken two thousand years to kill them; who knows
how long it will take to bring them to life.” (13)
Notes:
1. D.H. Lawrence, Apocalypse and Other Writings,
Cambridge University Press, 1931, p. 78
2. Richard Rudgley, Lost Civilisations of the Stone Age, Arrow
Books, London, 1999
3. The Myth of the Goddess, p. 661
4 . Steve Taylor, The Fall, O Books, Hampshire, England, 2005
5 . Joseph Campbell, Oriental Mythology, Penguin Books, London,
1970, p. 139
6 .Thorkild Jacobsen, The Treasures of Darkness, A History of the
Mesopotamian Religion, Yale University Press, 1976, p. 77
7 . Karl Kerenyi, Zeus and Hera, Bollingen Press
8 . David Abram, The Spell of the Sensuous, p. 254
9 . Leonard Shlain, The Alphabet and the Goddess, Viking, New
York, 1998, p. 40
10 . ibid, pp. 44
11. Frederick Turner, Beyond Geography, The Western Spirit Against
the Wilderness, p. xxiv-xxv
12. Ervin Laszlo, Science and the Reenchantment of the Cosmos,
Inner Traditions, Vermont, 2006 and Richard Tarnas, Cosmos and Psyche,
Viking, New York, 2006
13. op. cit. p. 78