CHAPTER SIXTEEN
Dreams:
Messages of the Soul
testing
Dream Flowers
In last night's dream who put into my hand
Two sprigs of verbena, culled from what sweet tree?
Your mother, it was told me, though I could not see her:
But to what daughter and by what mother,
By what Demeter to what Persephone given?
Was the hand mine that took those flowers
Given from one world to another?
There is a speech by none in this
life spoken,
Yet we the speakers, we the listeners seem;
In that discourse, all signifies:
But what mind means the meaning that then is known?
Flowers of the earth grow out
of mystery
From the deep loam of what has been
The past rises up in their life-stream
On whose surface images form and re-form;
But dreams rise up from a deeper spring:
Not from the past nor from the future come, but from the origin
These semblances of knowledge veiled in being.
—
from The Hollow Hill, by Kathleen Raine
Dreams connect this time-bound world with an eternal one. Like the thread
of Ariadne, they are a tenuous but vital link with the source of our
being, one of the very few guides we have through the labyrinth of life.
Without this thread connecting us to the fathomless source of ourselves,
it is difficult to find the way towards gaining the cooperation and
guidance of the instinct, as well as to recognize and transform its
immensely powerful and dangerous aspect that is symbolized in mythology
by the Minotaur, the Gorgon and the Dragon. Only through a growing relationship
with the soul can the destructive powers of the instinct be contained
and transformed so that we are no longer condemned, like Sisyphus, to
sacrifice our lives to the fruitless labour of endlessly repeating the
negative patterns of the past.
The interpretation
of dreams as a way of healing both soul and body and of deepening our
understanding of life is one of the great rediscoveries of the nineteenth
and twentieth centuries. “The dream,” Jung wrote,“is
the small hidden door in the deepest and most intimate sanctum of the
soul, which opens into that primeval cosmic night that was soul long
before there was a conscious ego and will be soul far beyond what a
conscious ego could ever reach.” (1)
Yet, despite
more than a hundred years of dream analysis since Freud wrote his Interpretation
of Dreams, there is still no general awareness in our culture that
dreams are of any value or significance. Children are not brought up
to be aware of their dreams, to share them with parents, teachers or
friends, or to find wonder and interest in their meaning. Politicians
are not taught how to recognize and pay attention to dreams that might
warn them of the inadvisability of taking nations into war. Dreams are
something that just happen: nice dreams and nasty dreams come and go
rather like the weather but, unlike the weather, we don't comment on
them to each other. As soon as the night is over, they are forgotten
and we pass on to the more important concerns of daily life without
making any attempt to remember them or to understand their meaning.
Are we neglecting a vital aspect of our lives?
Heinrich
Zimmer tells a magical story in his book, The King and the Corpse:
It
was remarkable, the way the king became involved in the adventure.
For ten years, every day, there had been appearing in his audience
chamber, where he sat in state hearing petitions and dispensing justice,
a holy man in the robe of a beggar ascetic, who, without a word, would
offer him a fruit. And the royal personage would accept the trifling
present, passing it along without an afterthought to his treasurer
standing behind the throne. Without making any request, the mendicant
would then withdraw and vanish into a crowd of petitioners, having
betrayed no sign either of disappointment or of impatience.
Then it
happened one day, some ten years after the first appearance of the
holy man, that a tame monkey, having escaped from the women's apartments
in the inner palace, came bounding into the hall and leaped upon the
arm of the throne. The mendicant had just presented his gift, and
the king playfully handed it over to the monkey. When the animal bit
into it, a valuable jewel dropped out and rolled across the floor.
The king's
eyes grew wide. He turned with dignity to the treasurer at his shoulder.
“What has become of all the others?” he asked. But the
treasurer was unable to say. He had been tossing the unimpressive
gifts through an upper, trellised window into the treasure house,
not even bothering to unlock the door. And so he excused himself and
hurried to the vault. Opening it, he made his way to the part beneath
the little window. There, on the floor, lay a mass of rotten fruit
in various stages of decay, and, amidst this debris of many years,
a heap of priceless gems. The beggar, it later transpired, bore the
appropriate name of “Rich in Patience.” (2)
Could
this image of the beggar - “Rich in Patience” - apply to
the soul who, night after night, sends us the jewels of our dreams,
only to have them tossed through the window of our lives onto the rubbish
heap to which we consign them, never discovering their meaning or asking
the sender's identity?
In his autobiography,
Jung comments on the importance of dreams for keeping us in touch with
our soul:
As scientific understanding
has grown, so our world has become dehumanized. Man feels himself
isolated in the cosmos, because he is no longer involved in nature
and has lost his emotional "unconscious identity" with natural
phenomena. These have slowly lost their symbolic implications…This
enormous loss is compensated for by the symbols of our dreams. They
bring up our original nature - its instincts and peculiar thinking.
Unfortunately they express their contents in the language of nature,
which is strange and incomprehensible to us. It therefore confronts
us with the task of translating it into the rational words and concepts
of modern speech, which has liberated itself…from its mystical
participation with the things it describes. (3)
The
very earliest recorded dream comes from Sumeria, from the Epic of
Gilgamesh. Gilgamesh had two vivid dreams of a meteor falling to
earth and of a great axe. He took these dreams to his mother to be interpreted
and learnt from her that the gods were to give him a mighty companion
whom he would take to his heart. From approximately the same period
- ca. 2000 BC - a cylinder seal records the dream of King Gudea of Lagash
who was addressed by the god Ningirsu, telling him to build a temple
in his honor. Unable to interpret the dream, he took it to the temple
of the goddess-mother Gatumdag and asked her for help. The goddess gave
the king her interpretation of the dream in dialogue with him. So
we know from these two examples that dreams were taken seriously in
Sumerian culture and that interpretations of them were expected and
received. (4)
In the Egyptian,
Sumero-Babylonian, Hebrew, Greek and Roman civilizations, as well as
in all shamanc cultures, dreams were used both for divination and healing.
In the Old Testament we know of the dreams of Pharaoh that were interpreted
by Joseph (Gen.41) and the dream of king Nebuchadnezzar interpreted
by Daniel (Daniel 2). Daniel, under the threat of death, had not only
to interpret the King's dream but even to tell him what it was, since
the king himself had forgotten it! Jacob's dream of the ladder set up
between earth and heaven with the angels ascending and descending is
a striking image of the pathway of communication between earth and heaven,
between the human soul and the eternal ground of spirit (Gen.28). The
stone on which he rested his head had, from the most ancient times,
been a symbol of divinity, and Jacob said of the place where he had
slept and dreamed: “This is none other but the house of God, and
this is the gate of heaven.” (Gen.28:17) How much lost knowledge
is contained in this one sentence.
Moving on
to Hellenistic times, in the second century AD, a Greek man called Artemidorus,
living in the city of Ephesus, recorded his observation of three thousand
dreams in five books. Arranging them in general categories, he noted
that it was important to have knowledge of the dreamer when interpreting
his dreams and to set the interpretation in the context of his life,
his outlook, his emotions and his desires.
A Sacred Space for Dreaming and Healing
Dreams as
communications from a transcendent dimension and as agents of healing,
divination and prophecy were received in places specially built for
this purpose. The origins of the “sacred place” set aside
for these purposes may go back to the Palaeolithic and Neolithic eras
when the shape of the cave and, later, the Megalithic temple-tomb, followed
the contours of the life-generating womb of the goddess.
In the time
of the Greek philosopher Parmenides (sixth century BC), there was in
Southern Italy, as in many other parts of the ancient world, a shamanic
tradition involving the practise of incubation in caves. Here, often
over a period of several days, the initiate would await dreams or make
a shamanic journey to the inner dimensions in order to receive guidance
which he would then bring back to this world. Parmenides himself wrote
a famous poem about a journey that took him “as far as longing
can reach.” His chariot, as he describes it, drawn by mares and
guided by young women, took him through gigantic gates that, stretching
between earth and heaven, opened onto the road that led into the great
chasm of the underworld. There he encountered the goddess Persephone
who, as he says, “welcomed me kindly and took my right hand in
hers,” giving him a message that he was instructed to take back
to the world of mortals. (5)
At Dodona,
in the north of Greece, and above all at Delphi, the celebrated priestesses
of the Oracle received embassies from all over the Greek empire, The
high priestess or Pythia at Delphi who also held the title of “The
Delphic Bee” was the highest authority in that world, intermediary
between the supplicant and the god Apollo. Here also, the serpent was
associated with the shrine of divination and prophecy and, as in the
Aesclepian sanctuaries, snakes were kept in the sacred precincts.
 |
| woman
or priestess experiencing rite of incubation?
from the Hypogeum in Malta
|
At
the Hypogeum in Malta, remarkable sanctuaries were hollowed out in three
descending layers deep under the earth, which suggests that they were
used for the purpose of incubation. The tiny statue of a sleeping woman
found in one of them may show a woman or a priestess in shamanic trance,
or receiving a special dream.
In Greece,
people traveled great distances to the many healing sanctuaries of the
god Aesclepius - the most famous of which were at Epidaurus, Kos and
Pergamum (modern Turkey) - to be healed of their diseases. Here, as
in Egypt and Crete, the main diagnostic agent was the dream, sometimes
a visionary dream of the god himself. As one man who was healed of his
long-standing illness described it, in words that leap up from a forgotten
past, “One listened and heard things, sometimes in a dream, sometimes
in waking life. One’s hair stood on end; one cried and felt happy;
one’s heart swelled out but not with vainglory. What human being
could put this experience into words? But anyone who has been through
it will share my knowledge and recognize the state of my mind.”
(6)
The serpent
is always shown in association with Aesclepius, suggesting the long-established
relationship between divine powers, the image of the serpent and the
regeneration of life. After the appropriate cleansing rituals had been
performed and sacrifices and invocations to the god had been made, the
patient was wrapped in a special robe and conducted to an underground
chamber, passageway or cave where he waited, sometimes for days, for
the healing dream. Sometimes the power of the dream itself brought the
desired cure, sometimes it was interpreted by priests trained in the
art of divining its meaning. Body and soul were treated as one unit.
Sickness of the body—as well as sickness of the mind—reflected
a state of imbalance between the patient and the gods, the nature of
which the dream would reveal. The ruins of Pergamum today give only
the faintest hint of the immense and thriving city that once stood there.
The Aesclepian healing sanctuary was five miles from the hill-top citadel,
yet still within the city limits. Amazingly, the springs of water that
flowed there so long ago flow there still today. I dipped my hands into
them when I was there.
The Platonic
academy in Athens, founded in the fifth century BC, lasted for a thousand
years, and it was perhaps here that the study of dreams was most completely
developed and disseminated over the Greek and later the Roman empire.
It was thought that sleep, in separating the soul from the life of the
senses, enabled the dreamer to awake to the inner life and open his
inner “eye”. It is a tragedy that this idea was not transmitted
to Christian civilization and that dreams were neglected for some fifteen
hundred years and with them, the living connection that people had not
only with their own soul but with the soul of the natural world.
Spirits into Demons
With the
rise and spread of Christianity, we leave the open, enquiring and generally
tolerant mind of the Greek world and discover a very different climate
of belief. We increasingly encounter an attitude toward the soul that
sees it as a battleground between the powers of darkness and light,
between the demonic hosts of Satan on the one hand, and the angelic
hosts of heaven on the other. The realm of air just above the earth
was imagined as Satan's territory, and from here he ruled over the earth
and humanity. The “spirits” of air, sea and earth, the daemons
so familiar to the Greeks and Romans and to older shamanic cultures,
were transformed into demons. The Church Fathers believed that demons
– led by Satan - were responsible for the malefic forces of nature
- storm, flood and hail - and for the diseases which afflicted men and
women. With psychological hindsight as well as historical knowledge,
we know that the loss of the archaic sense of oneness with nature and
with the spirits inhabiting nature led to the transformation of these
spirits into the “demons” that terrified people. Priests
were called to “exorcize” these demons rather than to heal
the underlying cause of mental or physical distress.
In the early
centuries of Christianity, stories about the furious battles of the
Desert Fathers with the Devil or the Evil One found their way into collective
beliefs and increased people’s fear of Satan. The greater the
effort to exorcize the demons and to resist the wiles and temptations
of Satan, the greater became the oppressive and repressive character
of Christianity until this process culminated in the dreadful practices
of the Inquisition and the witch-hunts of the fifteenth to eighteenth
centuries when many men as well as hundreds of thousands of women were
condemned to die agonizing deaths at the stake.
The Later Interpretation of Dreams
However,
the belief in the importance of dreams did not evaporate overnight.
For a thousand years dreams were still interpreted in many different
ways by the three primary cultures - Christian, Muslim and Hebrew -
which met on European soil. As late as the Renaissance - particularly
under the influence of the Platonic revival in fifteenth century Florence
inspired by Marsilio Ficino - dreams were again taken seriously as communicating
divine guidance and prophecy. It is said that Ficino put on his finest
robes in preparation for entering into a dialogue with the World-Soul,
the anima-mundi.
As a last
brilliant image of the dream at the threshold of the Renaissance in
fifteenth century France, there is the exquisite scene painted by King
René of Anjou at the beginning of his book, Le Livre du Cueur
d’Amours Espris, as described by Professor Unterkircher,
who wrote the commentary on this rare illustrated text. It describes
the journey of the King’s heart and its encounter with the helpful
and hindering creatures that it meets on its way to its spiritual destination.
This precious book is now one of the treasures of the National Library
in Vienna:
René, the King and Poet,
is asleep. In the magical night scene he sees himself and the figures
in his dream: Amour, the God of Love, is standing beside his bed and
with both hands plucks the heart from René’s breast, giving
it to the Page, Ardent Desire, who stands with hands outstretched to
receive it. It is not René himself who starts off on a journey
with the Page but his heart, personified as the Knight Cueur. The artist
brings this multileveled poetic allegory to life by giving its characters
a three-dimensional reality and endowing the scenes with color shadings
and light that almost transcend reality, suggesting that realm between
dream and daylight wherein poetry has its roots…The painting’s
physical details are as easy to describe as it is difficult or impossible
to do justice in words to its rich, dreamy atmosphere and masterful
color harmonies. (7)
 |
King René's
Dream |
But from this time until the nineteenth century, with the growing emphasis
on the scientific as opposed to the sacramental view of life, the split
widens between men and women and their dreaming soul. The numinous quality
once associated with dreams fades into the scepticism that has become
the main characteristic of modern secular culture.
Now, faced
with the abyss of nihilism that life without a transcendent meaning
presents to us, people are beginning once more to pay attention to their
dreams, responding to the exploration of the psyche led by the two great
pioneers of dream interpretation, Freud and Jung. Their discoveries
did not spring suddenly into being but developed out of soil that had
been cultivated during the nineteenth century by outstandingly gifted
men. The Romantic movement in Germany was interested in dreams. In the
early part of that century in Germany, von Schubert published The
Symbolism of Dreams, in which he described the pictorial language
of dreams as a “higher kind of algebra.” In 1867 in France,
Hervey de Saint-Denis (1823-1892) published his Dreams and the Means
to Direct Them.
Henri Ellenberger,
in his monumental work, The Discovery of the Unconscious, writes
that “The scarcity of this book is the more regrettable because
it contains the findings of a lifetime of dream investigation by a man
who opened new paths that few men were able to follow.”(8)
Saint-Denis began drawing his dreams as a child and, incredibly, for
twenty years never missed a single one, assembling twenty-two notebooks
recording the dreams of nineteen hundred and forty-six nights over this
period. His emphasis was on the possibility of controlling the dream
process from the conscious mind and not, as Jung’s approach would
be, on the idea that the dream process revealed the existence of a consciousness
superior to that of the waking mind.
Freud published
his Interpretation of Dreams in 1899 and brought together two
streams of nineteenth century exploration: the study of dreams and the
pathology of mental illness. Jung's obituary of Freud includes this
tribute to him: “Freud rescued something of the utmost value from
the past, where it had seemingly sunk in oblivion... It was an act of
the greatest scientific courage to make anything as unpopular as dreams
a subject of serious discussion.” (9)
Dreams as Messages from the Primordial Soul
Jung began
to understand the unconscious, not as Freud did, as the repository of
repressed infantile drives and wishes, but as a vitally creative “energy”
whose image-creating faculty was a primary element of human consciousness,
connecting it with the deeper dimension of the collective unconscious.
He observed that in Africa and in the American Indian tribes, for example,
men and women interpreted their “big” dreams and visions
as messages from the ancestors which were used as guidance for the tribe
as a whole, generation after generation. Such dreams, Jung believed,
reflected a superior intelligence and wisdom that represents a directing
energy or consciousness within our psychic depths—depths that
are the repository of the immemorial ancestral experience of life. He
saw the dream as a symbol in itself, a symbol which expressed an idea
or constellation of ideas that could not be expressed directly in words
but, rather, in images. Dreams, he realized, were one of the few ways
that the primordial instinctive soul could communicate with the conscious
mind: “Dream symbols are the essential message carriers from the
instinctive to the rational parts of the human mind, and their interpretation
enriches the poverty of consciousness so that it learns to understand
again the forgotten language of the instincts.”(10)
To be able
to interpret dreams, one has to have a wide knowledge of what symbolic
images have meant to humanity as a whole, as well as to specific cultures,
and to be able to understand what they meant to shamanic cultures which
were far more in touch with their soul than we are. In his last book,
Man and His Symbols, Jung commented:
We are so captivated by and
entangled in our subjective consciousness that we have forgotten the
age-old fact that God speaks chiefly through dreams and visions. The
Buddhist discards the world of unconscious fantasies as useless illusions;
the Christian puts his Church and his Bible between himself and his
unconscious; and the rational intellectual does not yet know that
his consciousness is not his total psyche. This ignorance persists
today in spite of the fact that for more than 70 years the unconscious
has been a basic scientific concept that is indispensable to any serious
psychological investigation…It seems almost incredible that
though we receive signals from the unconscious mind every night, deciphering
these communications seems too tedious for any but a very few people
to be bothered with it. Man's greatest instrument, his psyche, is
little thought of, and it is often directly mistrusted and despised.
“It’s only psychological” too often means: It is
nothing. (11)
The
dream never expresses its meaning in the logical sequence of left brain
thinking that the well-trained rational mind can grasp without effort.
On the contrary, it speaks in the language of parable, metaphor and
paradox, more closely related to right-hemispheric consciousness. The
apparent lack of clarity in most dreams comes from the fact that they
are presented in an unfamiliar language of images that has to be learnt,
just as one has to learn the language of hieroglyphs before one can
interpret the Egyptian Book of the Dead. Jung’s words
amplify this necessity:
Dreams contain images and thought
associations which we do not create with conscious intent. They arise
spontaneously without our assistance and are representatives of a
psychic activity withdrawn from our arbitrary will. Therefore the
dream is, properly speaking, a highly objective, natural product of
the psyche, from which we might expect indications, or at least hints,
about certain basic trends in the psychic process. Now, since the
psychic process, like any other life process, is not just a causal
sequence, but is also a process with a teleological orientation, we
might expect dreams to give us certain indicia about the objective
causality as well as about the objective tendencies, precisely because
dreams are nothing less than self-portraits of the psychic life-process.
(12)
Again,
he observes that “The dream comes in as the expression of an involuntary,
unconscious psychic process beyond the control of the conscious mind.
It shows the inner truth and reality of the patient as it really is:
not as I conjecture it to be, and not as he would like it to be, but
as it is…That is to say, I take dreams as diagnostically valuable
facts.” (13)
The dream
has a compensatory function in relation to the attitude of the conscious
mind. It reflects the “overall” view of a deeper intelligence
which can see both sides of the picture, both aspects of the psyche—that
which is known to the dreamer and that which is unknown. If a conscious
attitude is too rigid and limited, too inflated or too self-critical;
if the individual carries a deep unconscious trauma which is asking
for recognition and healing; if there is a danger of imbalance leading
to mental or physical illness, or if the dreamer is in danger of going
“off the rails,” the dream points the way to the integration
of the deeper knowledge and insight of the unconscious mind with the
conscious one and, therefore, to a better state of balance: “The
psyche is a self-regulating system that maintains its equilibrium just
as the body does. Every process that goes too far immediately and inevitably
calls forth compensations, and without these there would be neither
a normal metabolism nor a normal psyche. In this case we can take the
theory of compensation as a basic law of psychic behaviour. Too little
on one side results in too much on the other…When we set out to
interpret a dream, it is always helpful to ask: What conscious attitude
does it compensate?” (14)
The dream
of a woman concerned about her relationship with her daughter reflects
the need for greater consciousness: “I am lying in bed asleep
on Easter Day. My daughter brings me an Easter egg but I burrow under
the covers and refuse to look.”
This dream
shows the dreamer lying asleep (unconscious) on the most significant
day of the year—the day when life is regenerated from death. Her
daughter represents both her daughter in real life and also the young,
growing aspect of herself - her new life - carrying in its hands the
symbol of this new life, still in embryonic form. She rejects both child
and offering, choosing to remain unconscious and hide under the bed
covers like an ostrich. The dream showed her what she was doing and
invited a revaluation of her relationship with her own emerging creative
life, symbolized by her daughter, and also a transformation of her relationship
with her daughter in real life. The dream helped her to recognize that
she was, in fact, unconsciously rejecting both, a very painful realization.
Jung saw
this compensatory process as a natural, self-regulating one, which could
take place during sleep and not necessarily disturb the dreamer. But
he was convinced that when dreams woke the dreamer up, it was because
the unconscious mind wanted to bring certain things to the attention
of the conscious mind, to stimulate it to reflect on their meaning:
Dreams preserve sleep whenever
possible: that is to say, they function necessarily and automatically
under the influence of the sleeping state; but they break through
when their function demands it, that is, when the compensatory contents
are so intense that they are liable to counteract sleep. A compensatory
content is especially intense when it has a vital significance for
conscious orientation. (15)
The
“big” dream and the nightmare are two examples of intense
contents which are significant for conscious orientation, but the more
one reflects on “small” dreams, the more they reveal their
meaning; so that, although one may be very far from understanding the
meaning of every dream, one becomes progressively more familiar with
one's own dream symbolism and, therefore, more able to respond to it.
One begins to recognize the soul or the body's signals of harmony or
distress, continually deepening the sense of relationship between the
two aspects of the psyche, the older, wiser aspect and the younger,
inexperienced aspect (the ego personality) which is trying to make sense
of life. As Jung observed, “Through the assimilation of unconscious
contents, the momentary life of consciousness can once more be brought
into harmony with the law of nature from which it all too easily departs
and the individual can be led back to the natural law of his own being.”(16)
This alienation
from our own authentic being begins with the expectations we place upon
our children. Our culture imposes such ferocious extraverted demands
on children and young people, demands such as passing exams, learning
to use the new digital technology and gaining the qualifications needed
to reach “the top of the ladder” in a particular profession,
that soul needs may be neglected. This is particularly the case where
the channels for the expression of emotions and the skills which can
mediate and develop feeling – music, art, poetry and drama –
do not exist. Children as young as two now have televisions in their
bedrooms and are encouraged to learn how to use a computer. Many, even
at this age, watch hours of television. There is no place for the imagination
in their lives or for the creation of a relationship with the world
that surrounds them. There is no space simply to be. Instead, children
watch pre-programmed entertainment, or spend hours with their Play-Stations
and Game-Boys rather than interacting with their parents who are too
busy or too tired to devote to them the attention that their emotional
development requires.
Programmed
in this and other ways—perhaps through religious or even secular
indoctrination—some individuals may later develop a rigid controlling
attitude in relation to their lives and their needs, and may be convinced
of the infallibility or absolute truth of their convictions or beliefs.
Their once healthy instincts may have been so repressed and distorted
that they eventually control the conscious mind. One can see this tendency
in fundamentalism of all kinds, whether secular or religious. Fundamentalism
in its most extreme form merges into fanaticism, reflected in the behavior
of the Taliban and in the beliefs of certain fundamentalist Christian
sects in America. Fundamentalists cannot risk the intrusion of any doubt.
However, when the doubt is “deleted” or repressed into the
unconscious, it adds to the strident, messianic tone of the conscious
position. The tone of absolute conviction reflects the fact that the
unconscious is controlling the conscious personality. This is the psychology
of the bully who must, at all cost, control whatever situation she finds
herself in, whether at home or in the wider field of society. The need
for control arises from the need to deny what has been split off or
repressed.
At the other
end of the scale are people who may be so uncertain of themselves and
their own needs that they are easily manipulated or influenced by others
because they have no sense of their own or other's boundaries. They
may have difficulty establishing themselves in life, and may all too
readily become the victim in a relationship or are easily persuaded
to follow an ideology, forceful personality or charismatic leader. The
first attitude reflects a “superman” attitude towards life,
where the goal is to control, dominate and manipulate events through
one’s will. The second attitude may lead to a surrender to what
one perceives as life's overwhelmingly hostile power and the conviction
that adverse circumstances can never be changed. If accompanied by strict
religious beliefs, everything is accepted as the “will of God,”
or the “will of Allah”. Absolute obedience to a powerful
leader will be the corollary of this psychic attitude. Both perspectives
reflect an attitude that is too rigid and limited to include the full
potential of understanding and insight that could be available to the
conscious personality if unconscious needs and drives were integrated
with it.
The work
of Freud, Jung and thousands of others who have studied dreams in order
to understand the language of the soul has barely reached the consciousness
of the general public, yet the current interest in New Age approaches
to self-healing suggests that there may be millions of people who are
looking for a deeper understanding of themselves and of life. In the
intermediate stage between total indifference to dreams and the realization
that dreams may be conveying something important from the deeper strata
of the soul, they may be treated as something that can be exploited
by the conscious mind “for greater power and influence”.
This attitude gives rise to unqualified charlatans who set themselves
up as dream interpreters or therapists. It treats the unconscious as
a useful repository of power which can be harnessed to the achievement
of specific superficial goals such as the creation of wealth, but it
contributes nothing to reuniting the dissociated aspects of our being.
If anything it makes the unconscious the servant of the deficient aims
of the conscious ego and does great injury to the soul, trivializing
the priceless treasure of a deeper understanding of life, like the king
who nearly lost the treasure offered to him by the beggar at his court.
The word
psychology means “The word or speech of the soul”. Time
devoted to paying attention to our dreams helps us to deepen our understanding
of the speech of the soul. To become truly aware of our dream life and
to create a relationship with the unconscious - the instinctive part
of ourselves from which we are so estranged - we have to treat the dream
with an attitude of profound respect. There has been enough evidence
gathered during this last century alone to know with certainty that
the Dreamer, who night after night conveys the messages to our sleeping
self, is far more important than we realize, as the Jungian analyst,
Alan MacGlashan, relates in his book, The Savage and Beautiful Country:
The
concept of the Dreamer is among the most fascinating and relevant
of the mysteries facing contemporary man. It is nothing less than
an invitation to transcend our normal and habitual level of consciousness,
to develop a long-latent function, to enter a terra incognita of which,
paradoxically, we are free-born citizens. As Dante was led through
realms beyond human range by the ghost of Virgil, so the Dreamer can
lead us, through the labyrinthine corridors of sleep to a realm of
being where the human mind blooms in new and brilliant and unimagined
forms of life…
The Dreamer
is the source not only of dreams but of symbol, myth and fairy tale;
he is the ruler of a twilight kingdom which lies between the temporal
and the Timeless, or in theological terms, between man and God. The
Dreamer is he who tells us golden stories, coming from afar, that
are the only true salve and comfort of our existential condition;
and who brings us in the night, as his final gift, intimations of
the possibility of other forms of awareness - co-existent with our
conscious life...which perhaps need only a fractional turning of the
head to be seen and known. (17)
The Traumatized Instinct
Paradoxically
- and this is most important - where the instinct has been deeply traumatized,
it can also present itself as something or someone that is deeply threatening
to the dreamer, even something demonic in its apparent intent to destroy.
No one has illustrated this better than Donald Kalsched in his book,
The Inner World of Trauma. As he explains, “the traumatized
psyche is self-traumatizing. Trauma doesn’t end with the cessation
of outer violation, but continues unabated in the inner world of the
trauma victim, whose dreams are often haunted by persecutory inner figures.”
The second finding is that “the victim of personalized trauma
continually finds himself or herself in life situations where he or
she is re-traumatized.”(18)
For the person who has experienced
unbearable pain, the psychological defense of dissociation allows
external life to go on but at a great internal cost. The outer trauma
ends and its effects may be largely “forgotten,” but the
psychological sequelae of the trauma continue to haunt the inner world,
and they do this, Jung discovered, in the form of certain images which
cluster around a strong affect…These complexes tend to behave
autonomously as frightening inner “beings,” who are represented
in dreams as attacking “enemies,” vicious animals, etc.
(19)
I
think the insight into the fact that the victim of trauma repeats the
pattern of traumatization could be applied to the life of humanity as
a whole. A powerful example of this can be seen in how we continually
re-enact and suffer the trauma of war. The memories of conflict and
the suffering engendered through past conflicts do not go away with
the coming of new generations. They are held in the unconscious of the
species, ready to be re-activated when specific “triggers”
call forth the same response. If we can gain some insight into what
psychological factors cause us to be caught up in this pattern of unconscious
repetition, we might be able to transform it. Without insight, we seem
destined to continue as before.
The Effects of the Trauma of War
Whatever
the causes of why we are addicted to war - whether it is the influence
on us of the archetypal pattern of the warrior or the ongoing inner
conflict in our soul between the conscious mind and the primordial instinct
- we need to understand its effects better than we do. There are not
many books on the effects of war on the soul. One of the most interesting
has been written by the Jungian analyst, Edward Tick, who has devoted
his life to treating traumatized veterans of war, the Vietnam War in
particular. In his book, War and the Soul, he writes that veterans
can be haunted for years by reliving in nightmares the original terrifying
experiences they underwent. “They may see themselves killing again,
or friends and enemies dying again. They may have waking visions of
dead friends, enemies, or both. They may also, in retrospect, feel moral
anguish that the people they killed did not deserve to die.” (20)
Though hostilities cease and
life moves on, and though loved ones yearn for their healing, veterans
often remain drenched in the imagery and emotion of war for decades
and sometimes for their entire lives. For these survivors, every vital
human characteristic that we attribute to the soul may be fundamentally
reshaped. These traits include how we perceive; how our minds are
organized and function; how we love and relate; what we believe, expect,
and value; what we feel and refuse to feel; and what we judge as good
or evil, right or wrong. Thought the affliction that today we call
post-traumatic stress disorder has had many names over the centuries,
it is always the result of the way war invades, wounds ands transforms
our spirit. (21)
As he explores the effects of war on the soul and the reasons he explains
why post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is so difficult to treat.
He writes, “…the traumatic impact of war and violence inflicts
wounds so deep we need to address them with extraordinary attention,
resources and methods. Conventional methods of medical and psychological
functioning and therapeutics are not adequate to explain or treat such
wounds. Veterans and their afflictions try to tell us so.” (22)
War devastates not only our
physical being but our very soul—for the entire culture as well
as for the individual. In war, chaos overwhelms compassion, violence
replaces cooperation, instinct replaces rationality, gut dominates
mind. When drenched in these conditions, the soul is disfigured and
can become lost for life. What is called soul loss is an extreme psychospiritual
condition beyond what psychologists commonly call dissociation. It
is far more than psychic numbing or separation of mind from body.
It is a removal of the center of experience from the living body without
completely snapping the connection. In the presence of overwhelming
life-threatening violence, the soul—the true self—flees.
The center of experience shifts; the body takes the impact of the
trauma but does not register it as deeply as before. With body and
soul separated, a person is trapped in a limbo where past and present
intermingle without differentiation or continuity. Nothing feels right
until body and soul rejoin. (23)
It is worth reading his book to discover not only how he defines soul
but the efficacy of the methods he uses to reconnect soul and body.
Changing Our Lives
Dreams can
tell us what has happened and what is happening to the instinct. Since
we have so little awareness of this dimension of ourselves and even
less knowledge of how to connect with it, we are deprived of the means
of responding to it. With greater understanding of them, dreams can
immeasurably enrich our lives, drawing us closer to the meaning of our
suffering if, for example, we have experienced the loss of soul described
above through the trauma of war or the trauma of a personal catastrophe
in our lives such as the loss of a parent, a child, or the disintegration
of a relationship.
As an example
of how paying attention to dreams can change the course of one’s
life, the late English poet laureate, Ted Hughes, tells of a dream that
he had when he was at university. He had been working on an essay until
late into the night. Exhausted, he fell asleep. He dreamed that he was
sitting once again at his desk. Suddenly, the door of his study opened
and a man with the head of a fox came in. The fox-man looked as if he
had been in a fire and his skin was blackened and bleeding. He came
to the table and put a blood-stained paw on the white page of Hughes'
essay, saying, “This is killing both of us.” Deeply shaken
by this dream, Ted Hughes decided the next day to switch studies from
English literature to anthropology. The effort to subject the literature
and poetry that he loved to deconstructive criticism had been killing
his instinct and even threatening his life.
Learning
to understand the symbolic language of the soul and to apply the insight
gained to the problems of our relationships with other people and our
relationship with life, can gradually transform us. We can learn to
live life in a different way, less blindly, no longer at the mercy of
unconscious complexes, no longer reacting blindly to events; more sensitively
aware of the direction in which life is seeking to take us. We are aware
of our smallness in relation to life’s greatness, but we are also
aware that life may depend for the fulfilment of its purpose upon this
frail vessel of our consciousness which it has brought into being over
so many millions of years.
To face
the darkness of the soul and to learn how to relate to it is an act
of heroism in an age which denies the existence of the soul and has
come to disparage and reject whatever does not appear to be “rational”.
Not surprisingly, in view of its neglect of the soul, our culture is
now confronted by an eruption of the “irrational” in the
form of the hatred, anger and violence of terrorism, violent crime and
self-destructive patterns of behavior such as drug-addiction and alcoholism.
It tries to eradicate the threat by exerting ever more control instead
of looking at the causes which have given rise to these symptoms of
distress. It may be difficult to comprehend the hypothesis that the
terrorism and the crime we fight with weapons, armies and prisons, thinking
to control and eliminate them, may be a manifestation of our own shadow,
our own traumatized and split off instincts. Because, at the deepest
level, we are all connected with each other, these instincts manifest
in the world as an enemy intent on destroying us whom we then attempt
to destroy.
The Dream as Prophecy
Sometimes
a visionary dream can be dreamt on behalf of a tribal group, even perhaps
the whole of humanity. Yet who today except someone familiar with the
Jungian approach to dreams, would pay attention to such a dream or recognize
that it carried a message for our time? In contrast to this, the dreams
of the people of indigenous cultures were always taken seriously and
paid close attention for this reason. The famous dream of a nine year
old boy belonging to the Sioux tribe in America is well known and worth
recalling here. As an old man he recounted it to a Nebraskan poet called
John Neihardt who recorded it in his book Black Elk Speaks.
He had seen himself standing on the central mountain of the world which
he recognized as his own sacred peak in his homeland, even though he
knew that “anywhere is the center of the world.” “I
was seeing” he said, “the shapes of all things in the spirit,
and the shape of all things as they must live together, like one being.
And I saw the the sacred hoop of my people was one of many hoops that
made one circle, wide as daylight and as starlight, and in the center
grew one mighty flowering tree to shelter all the children of one mother
and one father.” (24)
The Dream as Emissary
The dream
plays the role of the god Thoth in Egypt, or the Greek god Hermes, acting
as emissary between the deeper dimension of the instinctive soul and
the conscious personality. In the more familiar imagery of Christianity
and also the less familiar imagery of Kabbalah, the Dreamer may be compared
to an angelic messenger, bringing guidance, warning and the possibility
of healing.
Dreams may
come dressed in the humble garb of everyday life, using as symbolic
images people and things that we see, hear, touch and meet in the course
of our lives, yet their role may be compared to that of the four great
archangels of the Christian tradition, who are the messengers or emissaries
of the unseen dimension of spirit.
In the famous
story of Tobias and the Angel in the Apocrypha, Raphael did
not reveal himself to Tobias and his father until Tobias, realizing
how much his new found friend had accomplished, said to his father,
“Oh Father, it is no harm to me to give him half of those things
which I have brought: for he hath brought me again to thee in safety,
and made whole my wife, and brought me the money, and likewise healed
thee.” (Tobit 12:2-4)
How much
we may miss by our neglect of the messenger or our failure to recognize
its message is conveyed in the tremendous revelation which follows:
“I am Raphael, one of the seven holy angels, which present the
prayers of the saints, and which go in and out before the glory of the
Holy One.” (Tobit 12:15)
 |
Filippino
Lippi
Tobias and the Angel |
Dreams may come as emissaries of the infinitely
older and wiser consciousness in the depths of our soul. In the
imagery of the four great archangels of ancient tradition, they can
bring us, as Gabriel brought to Mary, the annunciation of a divine
birth within the soul, the illuminating awareness of a different
order of reality. Like Michael, who traditionally wields the sword of
discrimination, dreams may offer the judgment of the spirit upon
the way we live our lives, upon the deficiency of our conscious
values and our rejection of anything which cannot be “proven”
by the rational mind or perceived by the senses. Like Raphael,
they may bring us healing for the buried wounds our soul carries; like
Uriel they may bring understanding and insight.
All these
are vital aspects of the role dreams can play in expanding our knowledge
of and relationship with the soul. But these messages come to
us in a form that may be hard to recognize unless we are familiar
with the language of symbols. Instead of thundering with the voice of
an archangel, they may in a subtle, even humorous way point out
the fact that we need to change our standpoint by buying some new
shoes.
Perseverance
in the effort to understand the symbolic imagery of dreams brings its
reward in the establishment of an attitude of nightly listening
to the messages which come as visitors from that other dimension
of reality. The gradual growth of understanding is occasionally marked
by the “Big Dream”—a moment of revelation which can
give direction and meaning to our life and is altogether outside our
normal frame of reference, even having a reference for the culture as
a whole, as in the dream of Black Elk above. So we would be wise to
remember the words written in the Babylonian Talmud: A dream which is
not interpreted is like a letter which is left unread.
Notes:
1.C.G. Jung, CW 10, par. 304
2. Heinrich Zimmer, The King and the Corpse, Bollingen Foundation,
Pantheon books, New York, 1957, p. 202
3. C.G. Jung, Man and His Symbols, p. 102
4. King Gudea of Lagash dream, Joseph Campbell, The Masks of God,
Occidental Mythology, p. 117-119
5. Peter Kingsley, In the Dark Places of Wisdom, The Golden
Sufi Center, California, 1999
6. Dreams: Visions of the Night, Thames and Hudson, London
(no date) editor Jill Purce, p. 18
7. Le Livre du Cueur d’Amours Espris, Thames and Hudson,
London, 1975. translation and commentary by F. Unterkircher. Manuscript
in The National Library, Vienna
8. Henri F. Ellenberger, The Discovery of the Unconscious,
p. 306
9. C.G. Jung, In Memory of Sigmund Freud, 1939, pp. 44-45
10. Man and His Symbols, p. 52
11. ibid, p. 102
12. Jung, CW 7, par. 210
13. Jung, CW 16, par. 304
14. CW 8, par. 487
15. CW 16, par. 330
16. CW 16, par. 351
17. Alan McGlashan, The Savage and Beautiful Country, Chatto
and Windus, London, 1966, p.126 and 132
18. Donald Kalsched, The Inner World of Trauma: Archetypal Defenses
of the Personal Spirit, Routledge, New York, 1996, p. 5
19. ibid, p. 13
20. Edward Tick, War and the Soul, Quest Books, Wheaton, Illinois,
2005, p. 138
21. ibid, p. 1
22. ibid, p. 2
23. ibid, p. 16
24. John G. Neihardt, Black Elk Speaks, University of Nebraska
Press, Lincoln, Nebraska, pp. 20-47 (recounted in Joseph Campbell, The
Inner Reaches of Outer Space, p. 33
------
------ 
|